aws-vault 7.3.7#226185
Conversation
|
I think you should submit as a new formula, not changing previous one. It is not an official descendant. |
|
Project seems abandoned and no response from maintainers for a while. It's a in-place replacement and direct fork. Could we at least retire this and add new one? Otherwise the naming might be overlapping. |
|
Here is our policy to accept forks. |
|
You could add your own tap to use the same formula name, then the full name of the formula will be |
|
Thanks for the suggestion, but I'm not sure I want to maintain my own tap ATM 🤔 |
|
What'd be suggestion in case project is dead and we cannot get updates upstream anymore? |
|
In case we can get a response from anyone at upstream (if maintainers will respond) I've opened: 99designs/aws-vault#1270 |
6094a46 to
16541cc
Compare
16541cc to
5b02d8f
Compare
|
🤖 An automated task has requested bottles to be published to this PR. Please do not push to this PR branch before the bottle commits have been pushed, as this results in a state that is difficult to recover from. If you need to resolve a merge conflict, please use a merge commit. Do not force-push to this PR branch. |
|
Thanks @mbevc1! |
Change to maintained fork and bump version
HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew test <formula>, where<formula>is the name of the formula you're submitting?brew audit --strict <formula>(after doingHOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it passbrew audit --new <formula>?