Skip to content

small copy improvements - #833

Merged
aantn merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
small-text-tweaks
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

aantn merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
small-text-tweaks

Conversation

@aantn

@aantn aantn commented Aug 13, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@aantn
aantn requested a review from arikalon1 August 13, 2025 05:54
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

Adds a timeout and enhanced error handling to Grafana health check, including conditional guidance when a Loki direct URL is detected with a Grafana datasource UID. Updates a user-facing disabled_reason string in the Robusta toolset. No public signatures changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Grafana health check adjustments
holmes/plugins/toolsets/grafana/grafana_api.py
Added timeout=10 to health check request; refactored error handling to assemble and return error_msg; conditionally appends guidance when grafana_datasource_uid is set and URL includes ":3100"; success still returns (True, ""); failure returns (False, error_msg). No signature changes.
Robusta toolset messaging update
holmes/plugins/toolsets/robusta/robusta.py
Changed dal_prereq.disabled_reason text to "Integration with Robusta cloud is disabled". No logic or signature changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Caller
  participant GrafanaAPI
  participant GrafanaServer

  Caller->>GrafanaAPI: health_check(config, url)
  GrafanaAPI->>GrafanaServer: HTTP GET /health (timeout=10)
  alt Success
    GrafanaServer-->>GrafanaAPI: 200 OK
    GrafanaAPI-->>Caller: (True, "")
  else Failure
    GrafanaServer-->>GrafanaAPI: Error/Timeout
    GrafanaAPI->>GrafanaAPI: Build error_msg (+guidance if uid set and ":3100")
    GrafanaAPI-->>Caller: (False, error_msg)
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch small-text-tweaks

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@aantn
aantn marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2025 05:55
@aantn
aantn enabled auto-merge (squash) August 13, 2025 05:55

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
holmes/plugins/toolsets/robusta/robusta.py (1)

204-211: Unify and clarify disabled_reason copy; capitalize “Robusta Cloud”

Two different messages are used depending on whether DAL exists or not. For consistency and clearer UX, suggest:

  • When dal is None: “Robusta Cloud integration is not configured”
  • When dal exists but is disabled: “Robusta Cloud integration is disabled”

This aligns the copy and avoids mixing “Data access layer” phrasing with the Robusta integration terminology.

Apply this diff:

-        dal_prereq = StaticPrerequisite(
-            enabled=True if dal else False,
-            disabled_reason="Integration with Robusta cloud is disabled",
-        )
+        dal_prereq = StaticPrerequisite(
+            enabled=True if dal else False,
+            disabled_reason="Robusta Cloud integration is not configured",
+        )
@@
-            dal_prereq = StaticPrerequisite(
-                enabled=dal.enabled, disabled_reason="Data access layer is disabled"
-            )
+            dal_prereq = StaticPrerequisite(
+                enabled=dal.enabled, disabled_reason="Robusta Cloud integration is disabled"
+            )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between acb3ea2 and 8c98d89.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • holmes/plugins/toolsets/grafana/grafana_api.py (1 hunks)
  • holmes/plugins/toolsets/robusta/robusta.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.py

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

**/*.py: ALWAYS place Python imports at the top of the file, not inside functions or methods
Use Ruff for formatting and linting (configured in pyproject.toml)
Type hints required (mypy configuration in pyproject.toml)
Pre-commit hooks enforce quality checks
Don't add convenience logs that give away the problem
Don't write logs that directly state the issue
Ensure historical timestamps are properly handled in logs (especially with Loki)

Files:

  • holmes/plugins/toolsets/robusta/robusta.py
  • holmes/plugins/toolsets/grafana/grafana_api.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: llm_evals
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks

Comment thread holmes/plugins/toolsets/grafana/grafana_api.py
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Results of HolmesGPT evals

  • ask_holmes: 23/40 test cases were successful, 1 regressions, 2 skipped, 14 mock failures
Test suite Test case Status
ask 01_how_many_pods ✅
ask 02_what_is_wrong_with_pod 🔧
ask 03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward 🔧
ask 04_related_k8s_events ↪️
ask 05_image_version 🔧
ask 09_crashpod ✅
ask 10_image_pull_backoff 🔧
ask 11_init_containers ✅
ask 14_pending_resources ✅
ask 15_failed_readiness_probe 🔧
ask 17_oom_kill ✅
ask 18_crash_looping_v2 ✅
ask 19_detect_missing_app_details 🔧
ask 20_long_log_file_search 🔧
ask 24_misconfigured_pvc 🔧
ask 28_permissions_error ✅
ask 29_events_from_alert_manager ↪️
ask 39_failed_toolset 🔧
ask 41_setup_argo ✅
ask 42_dns_issues_steps_new_tools 🔧
ask 43_current_datetime_from_prompt ✅
ask 45_fetch_deployment_logs_simple ✅
ask 51_logs_summarize_errors 🔧
ask 53_logs_find_term ✅
ask 54_not_truncated_when_getting_pods 🔧
ask 59_label_based_counting ✅
ask 60_count_less_than 🔧
ask 61_exact_match_counting ✅
ask 63_fetch_error_logs_no_errors ✅
ask 79_configmap_mount_issue 🔧
ask 83_secret_not_found 🔧
ask 86_configmap_like_but_secret 🔧
ask 89_runbook_missing_cloudwatch ❌
ask 93_calling_datadog ✅
ask 93_calling_datadog ✅
ask 93_calling_datadog ✅
ask 97_logs_clarification_needed ✅
ask 110_k8s_events_image_pull 🔧
ask 24a_misconfigured_pvc_basic 🔧
ask 13a_pending_node_selector_basic 🔧

Legend

  • ✅ the test was successful
  • ↪️ the test was skipped
  • ⚠️ the test failed but is known to be flaky or known to fail
  • 🔧 the test failed due to mock data issues (not a code regression)
  • ❌ the test failed and should be fixed before merging the PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants