Skip to content

Fixed Some test cases during a POC for Claude models - #682

Merged
Sheeproid merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
thinking-poc
Jul 23, 2025
Merged

Sheeproid merged 9 commits into
masterfrom
thinking-poc

Conversation

@Sheeproid

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No description provided.

@Sheeproid
Sheeproid requested a review from aantn July 22, 2025 12:25
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2025 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

This change updates and cleans up test fixtures for Kubernetes troubleshooting scenarios. It deletes numerous static output and log files, modifies test case YAMLs for clarity and specificity, comments out certain monitoring resources, adjusts container and service ports, introduces a new DNS/network policy test case with corresponding manifests and toolset configuration, and updates toolset enablement flags.

Changes

Files/Paths (grouped) Change Summary
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/* Deleted multiple Kubernetes fixture files (deployment, pod, logs, lineage, resource, previous logs, etc.); commented out monitoring YAML; updated test_case.yaml tags and expected output; enabled aws/rds toolset.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/* Deleted multiple Kubernetes fixture files (describe, get, lineage, etc.); updated deployment and service ports to 80; refined test_case.yaml prompt, expected output, and evaluation section.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml Added new manifest defining namespace, network policy (egress deny), client/server pods, and service for DNS test.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/test_case.yaml Added new test case YAML for DNS/network policy troubleshooting, with setup/teardown and evaluation fields.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/toolsets.yaml Added toolsets configuration file specifying enabled/disabled toolsets and allowed commands per image.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant LLM Test Harness
    participant Kubernetes Cluster

    User->>LLM Test Harness: Submit troubleshooting prompt (e.g., DNS issue)
    LLM Test Harness->>Kubernetes Cluster: Apply test manifest (namespace, pods, network policy)
    LLM Test Harness->>LLM Test Harness: Wait/setup
    LLM Test Harness->>LLM: Provide prompt and context (toolsets enabled, logs, etc.)
    LLM->>LLM Test Harness: Generate diagnostic output
    LLM Test Harness->>Kubernetes Cluster: Teardown (delete manifest)
    LLM Test Harness->>User: Return evaluation result
Loading

Estimated code review effort

3 (~45 minutes)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fa039a9 and 833b458.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: llm_evals
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (2)

1-7: Expected output is again too prescriptive.

Prior learnings note that strict wording causes false negatives. Requiring the answer to “clearly state that example-ingress-class does not exist” may fail an otherwise correct LLM reply that phrases it differently (e.g., “no such ingress class”). Consider loosening to “must mention that the specified ingress class is missing”.

-  - It should clearly state that example-ingress-class does not exist - saying it just might not exist is not good enough.
+  - The answer should indicate the specified ingress class (`example-ingress-class`) is missing or not present in the cluster.

11-11: Comment acknowledges test weakness—consider turning into TODO.

Instead of an inline remark, add a formal todo: entry so it surfaces during test maintenance.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/toolsets.yaml (1)

10-11: Normalize boolean style for consistency

prometheus/metrics.enabled uses False (capital F) while the new aws/rds.enabled follows the lower-case convention (true). Pick one style across the file to avoid noisy diffs and accidental mis-merges.

-  prometheus/metrics:
-    enabled: False
+  prometheus/metrics:
+    enabled: false
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/slow-rds-query-for-medium.yaml (1)

64-103: Large blocks commented out—delete or move to separate file

Keeping >40 commented lines clutters the manifest and invites drift. If these monitoring resources are truly irrelevant to this scenario, remove them or move to slow-rds-query-for-medium.monitoring.yaml so they can be re-enabled via kustomize/helm overlays when needed.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/toolsets.yaml (1)

11-16: Mixed quoting style for scalar values

busybox is unquoted, whereas the dnsutils image is quoted. Consistently quoting (or not) keeps diffs clean and avoids accidental parsing surprises.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml (1)

38-43: Containers run as root with privilege-escalation allowed (CKV_K8S_20 / CKV_K8S_23)

Hardening the fixtures costs two lines:

securityContext:
-  # empty – runs as root, escalation allowed
+  runAsNonRoot: true
+  allowPrivilegeEscalation: false

Not critical for a POC, but worth tightening before these files become reference material.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/test_case.yaml (1)

5-5: Assertion could be less brittle

Hard-coding default-deny-egress risks breakage if the policy name changes. Matching on “an egress-deny NetworkPolicy in test-ns” would keep the test flexible while still verifying the diagnosis.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f5060d0 and fa039a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (26)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_describe_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_describe_pod_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_find_resource_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_get_yaml_pod_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_lineage_children_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_logs_all_containers_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_previous_logs_all_containers_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/slow-rds-query-for-medium.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/toolsets.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/ingress_with_class.yaml (2 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_ingress.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_pod.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_service.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_find_resource.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_cluster.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_cluster_deployment.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace_deployment.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace_service.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_name.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_lineage_children.txt (0 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/test_case.yaml (1 hunks)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/toolsets.yaml (1 hunks)
🧠 Learnings (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/ingress_with_class.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml

[MEDIUM] 17-29: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 17-29: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)


[MEDIUM] 30-45: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 30-45: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (18)
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_cluster_deployment.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_ingress.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_lineage_children.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_service.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_name.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_cluster.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_find_resource.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace_service.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_describe_pod.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_describe_pod_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_logs_all_containers_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_lineage_children_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium_default.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_describe_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium_default.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/kubectl_get_by_kind_in_namespace_deployment.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_previous_logs_all_containers_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_find_resource_deployment_customer-orders-for-medium.txt
  • tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/kubectl_get_yaml_pod_customer-orders-for-medium-7744d956fb-pv79v_default.txt
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/ingress_with_class.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/test_case.yaml (1)

Learnt from: Sheeproid
PR: #586
File: tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/03_what_is_the_command_to_port_forward/test_case.yaml:4-4
Timestamp: 2025-07-02T10:27:17.231Z
Learning: In LLM-as-judge test cases for HolmesGPT, expected outputs should be descriptive rather than prescriptive when testing for flexible responses like port numbers. Using specific values in expected outputs can cause unnecessary test failures when the AI generates different but equally valid responses.

🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml

[MEDIUM] 17-29: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 17-29: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)


[MEDIUM] 30-45: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation

(CKV_K8S_20)


[MEDIUM] 30-45: Minimize the admission of root containers

(CKV_K8S_23)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
  • GitHub Check: llm_evals
  • GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
🔇 Additional comments (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class/ingress_with_class.yaml (2)

48-49: Service targetPort updated correctly.

The service now forwards to targetPort: 80, keeping the Deployment/Service/Ingress stack consistent.


19-19: No stale 8080 references found – approving change

I ran a recursive search for “8080” in
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/25_misconfigured_ingress_class
and found no matches. The update to containerPort: 80 now correctly aligns with the service definition. No further changes needed here.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/22_high_latency_dbi_down/test_case.yaml (1)

6-6: Re-evaluate need for the explicit “logs” tag

The new tag is fine, but confirm that any grading logic actually keys off this tag; otherwise it’s dead weight and may confuse future readers.

tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/42_dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook/manifest.yaml (1)

25-29: Client image may lack DNS tools and is not in the toolset whitelist

mainred/client:v2 is neither guaranteed to contain nslookup/dig nor present in toolsets.yaml.
If the LLM tries to kubectl exec into this pod, the call will be rejected or the command will be missing—both break the test. Consider switching to busybox/dnsutils or add this image to the whitelist.

@Sheeproid
Sheeproid enabled auto-merge (squash) July 23, 2025 10:36
@Sheeproid
Sheeproid merged commit be51687 into master Jul 23, 2025
@Sheeproid
Sheeproid deleted the thinking-poc branch July 23, 2025 10:44
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Results of HolmesGPT evals

  • ask_holmes: 19/67 test cases were successful, 0 regressions, 43 mock failures
  • investigate: 4/16 test cases were successful, 0 regressions, 11 mock failures
Test suite Test case Status
ask 01: how_many_pods ✅
ask 02: what_is_wrong_with_pod 🔧
ask 03: what_is_the_command_to_port_forward 🔧
ask 04: related_k8s_events 🔧
ask 05: image_version 🔧
ask 06: explain_issue 🔧
ask 07: high_latency 🔧
ask 08: sock_shop_frontend ⚠️
ask 09: crashpod 🔧
ask 10: image_pull_backoff 🔧
ask 11: init_containers 🔧
ask 12: job_crashing 🔧
ask 13: pending_node_selector 🔧
ask 14: pending_resources 🔧
ask 15: failed_readiness_probe 🔧
ask 16: failed_no_toolset_found ✅
ask 17: oom_kill 🔧
ask 18: crash_looping_v2 🔧
ask 19: detect_missing_app_details 🔧
ask 20: long_log_file_search ✅
ask 21: job_fail_curl_no_svc_account ⚠️
ask 22: high_latency_dbi_down 🔧
ask 23: app_error_in_current_logs 🔧
ask 24: misconfigured_pvc ✅
ask 25: misconfigured_ingress_class 🔧
ask 26: multi_container_logs 🔧
ask 27: permissions_error_no_helm_tools 🔧
ask 28: permissions_error_helm_tools_enabled 🔧
ask 29: events_from_alert_manager 🔧
ask 30: basic_promql_graph_cluster_memory 🔧
ask 31: basic_promql_graph_pod_memory 🔧
ask 32: basic_promql_graph_pod_cpu 🔧
ask 33: http_latency_graph 🔧
ask 34: memory_graph 🔧
ask 35: tempo 🔧
ask 36: argocd_find_resource 🔧
ask 37: argocd_wrong_namespace 🔧
ask 38: rabbitmq_split_head 🔧
ask 39: failed_toolset ✅
ask 40: disabled_toolset ✅
ask 41: setup_argo ✅
ask 42: dns_issues_result_all_tools 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_result_new_tools 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_result_new_tools_no_runbook 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_result_old_tools 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_steps_new_all_tools 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_steps_new_tools 🔧
ask 42: dns_issues_steps_old_tools 🔧
ask 43: current_datetime_from_prompt ✅
ask 43: slack_deployment_logs 🔧
ask 44: slack_statefulset_logs 🔧
ask 45: fetch_deployment_logs_simple ✅
ask 46: job_crashing_no_longer_exists 🔧
ask 47: truncated_logs_context_window ⚠️
ask 48: logs_since_thursday 🔧
ask 49: logs_since_last_week 🔧
ask 50: logs_since_specific_date 🔧
ask 51: logs_summarize_errors ✅
ask 52: logs_login_issues ⚠️
ask 53: logs_find_term ✅
ask 54: not_truncated_when_getting_pods ✅
ask 55: kafka_runbook 🔧
ask 56: kafka_runbook_no_tool ✅
ask 58: counting_pods_by_status ⚠️
ask 59: label_based_counting ✅
ask 60: time_based_filtering 🔧
ask 61: exact_match_counting ✅
investigate 01: oom_kill 🔧
investigate 02: crashloop_backoff 🔧
investigate 03: cpu_throttling 🔧
investigate 04: image_pull_backoff 🔧
investigate 05: crashpod ✅
investigate 06: job_failure ✅
investigate 07: job_syntax_error 🔧
investigate 08: memory_pressure 🔧
investigate 09: high_latency 🔧
investigate 10: KubeDeploymentReplicasMismatch 🔧
investigate 11: KubePodCrashLooping 🔧
investigate 12: KubePodNotReady 🔧
investigate 13: Watchdog 🔧
investigate 14: tempo 🔧
investigate 15: dns_resolution 🔧
investigate 16: dns_resolution_no_tool ⚠️

Legend

  • ✅ the test was successful
  • ⚠️ the test failed but is known to be flaky or known to fail
  • 🔧 the test failed due to mock data issues (not a code regression)
  • ❌ the test failed and should be fixed before merging the PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants