Repository navigation
Conversation
Implements 5 new eval tests that require bash scripting with kubectl exec: - 211: Process memory audit (single pod, 100 processes) - 212: Container disk usage audit (single pod, 100 files) - 213: Network connection audit (single pod, 100 connections) - 214: Multi-pod disk check (10 pods) - 215: Multi-pod connectivity test (10 pods + NetworkPolicy) These tests verify Holmes can use the bash toolset to inspect in-container state that no existing toolset can access (processes, filesystem, network). Also adds bash-resource-checker pytest marker to pyproject.toml. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
The bash toolset explicitly doesn't support loop constructs (for/while/until). Removing 'for' from allow lists since it's not a valid command prefix anyway. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
211: Use Python processes that actually allocate memory in their address space so ps aux shows real memory usage. Changed from Alpine to python:3.11-alpine image. 213: Fix netcat command syntax for openbsd-netcat. Use while loop for persistent listeners and sleep|nc pattern for established connections. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|
✅ Deploy Preview for holmes-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
📂 Previous Runs📜 Run @ 26a5f9a (#21516345255)✅ Results of HolmesGPT evalsAutomatically triggered by commit 26a5f9a on branch 📜 Run @ c73a813 (#21515965999)✅ Results of HolmesGPT evalsAutomatically triggered by commit c73a813 on branch Results of HolmesGPT evals
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%. Historical Comparison DetailsFilter: excluding branch 'claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE' Status: Success - 9 test/model combinations loaded Experiments compared (30):
Comparison indicators:
📜 Run @ 3c4d80c (#21515467494)✅ Results of HolmesGPT evalsAutomatically triggered by commit 3c4d80c on branch Results of HolmesGPT evals
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%. Historical Comparison DetailsFilter: excluding branch 'claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE' Status: Success - 9 test/model combinations loaded Experiments compared (30):
Comparison indicators:
|
| Status | Test case | Time | Turns | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | 09_crashpod | 41.6s ↑34% | 7 | 12 | $0.2589 |
| ✅ | 101_loki_historical_logs_pod_deleted | 58.1s ↑31% | 7 | 13 | $0.3092 |
| ✅ | 111_pod_names_contain_service | 33.6s ±0% | 5 | 11 | $0.2210 |
| ✅ | 12_job_crashing | 36.3s ↑11% | 5 | 12 | $0.2485 |
| ✅ | 162_get_runbooks | 42.0s ±0% | 6 | 11 | $0.2684 |
| ✅ | 176_network_policy_blocking_traffic_no_runbooks | 45.7s ±0% | 5 | 16 | $0.2689 |
| ✅ | 211_bash_process_memory_audit | 35.9s | 5 | 8 | $0.2272 |
| 🚧 | 212_bash_container_disk_audit | — | — | — | — |
| ✅ | 213_bash_network_connection_audit | 44.6s | 5 | 6 | $0.2029 |
| ✅ | 214_bash_multipod_disk_check | 35.7s | 5 | 24 | $0.3350 |
| ✅ | 215_bash_multipod_connectivity | 43.3s | 6 | 18 | $0.3518 |
| ✅ | 24_misconfigured_pvc | 32.9s ±0% | 5 | 13 | $0.2223 |
| ✅ | 43_current_datetime_from_prompt | 5.4s ±0% | 1 | — | $0.1056 |
| ✅ | 61_exact_match_counting | 17.4s ↑21% | 4 | 4 | $0.1590 |
| Total | 36.3s avg | 5.1 avg | 12.3 avg | $3.1785 |
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%.
Historical Comparison Details
Filter: excluding branch 'claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE'
Status: Success - 9 test/model combinations loaded
Experiments compared (30):
- github-21514930829.2715.1-d9081e14 (branch:
claude/holmes-performance-benchmarks-yKW8b) - github-21514930829.2715.1 (branch:
claude/holmes-performance-benchmarks-yKW8b) - github-21512590398.2710.1 (branch:
claude/apply-external-diff-zncAe) - ...and 27 more
Comparison indicators:
±0%— diff under 10% (within noise threshold)↑N%/↓N%— diff 10-25%↑N%/↓N%— diff over 25% (significant)
📜 Run @ 23a455f (#21514820310)
✅ Results of HolmesGPT evals
Automatically triggered by commit 23a455f on branch claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE
Results of HolmesGPT evals
- ask_holmes: 13/14 test cases were successful, 0 regressions, 1 setup failures
| Status | Test case | Time | Turns | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | 09_crashpod | 35.5s ↑21% | 6 | 12 | $0.2514 |
| ✅ | 101_loki_historical_logs_pod_deleted | 46.3s ↑18% | 6 | 11 | $0.2806 |
| ✅ | 111_pod_names_contain_service | 33.0s ↑15% | 5 | 11 | $0.2237 |
| ✅ | 12_job_crashing | 33.8s ±0% | 5 | 12 | $0.2380 |
| ✅ | 162_get_runbooks | 46.2s ↑12% | 6 | 12 | $0.3013 |
| ✅ | 176_network_policy_blocking_traffic_no_runbooks | 48.6s ↑18% | 6 | 17 | $0.2881 |
| ✅ | 211_bash_process_memory_audit | 36.9s | 6 | 9 | $0.2184 |
| 🚧 | 212_bash_container_disk_audit | — | — | — | — |
| ✅ | 213_bash_network_connection_audit | 30.6s | 5 | 6 | $0.2045 |
| ✅ | 214_bash_multipod_disk_check | 35.6s | 5 | 24 | $0.3522 |
| ✅ | 215_bash_multipod_connectivity | 63.4s | 8 | 29 | $0.3408 |
| ✅ | 24_misconfigured_pvc | 32.4s ±0% | 5 | 13 | $0.2232 |
| ✅ | 43_current_datetime_from_prompt | 5.1s ±0% | 1 | — | $0.1053 |
| ✅ | 61_exact_match_counting | 17.8s ↑41% | 4 | 4 | $0.1594 |
| Total | 35.8s avg | 5.2 avg | 13.3 avg | $3.1870 |
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%.
Historical Comparison Details
Filter: excluding branch 'claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE'
Status: Success - 11 test/model combinations loaded
Experiments compared (30):
- github-21512590398.2710.1 (branch:
claude/apply-external-diff-zncAe) - github-21511535329.2709.1 (branch:
master) - github-21511398513.2705.1 (branch:
claude/add-datadog-api-keys-BDFKe) - ...and 27 more
Comparison indicators:
±0%— diff under 10% (within noise threshold)↑N%/↓N%— diff 10-25%↑N%/↓N%— diff over 25% (significant)
✅ Results of HolmesGPT evals
Automatically triggered by commit ce7cc19 on branch claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE
Results of HolmesGPT evals
- ask_holmes: 11/14 test cases were successful, 0 regressions, 3 setup failures
| Status | Test case | Time | Turns | Tools | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | 09_crashpod | 26.9s ↓15% | 4 | 9 | $0.2019 |
| ✅ | 101_loki_historical_logs_pod_deleted | 33.3s ↓23% | 4 | 8 | $0.2149 |
| ✅ | 111_pod_names_contain_service | 32.8s ±0% | 5 | 11 | $0.2197 |
| ✅ | 12_job_crashing | 45.2s ↑37% | 7 | 16 | $0.2945 |
| ✅ | 162_get_runbooks | 40.3s ±0% | 6 | 11 | $0.2820 |
| ✅ | 176_network_policy_blocking_traffic_no_runbooks | 51.4s ↑20% | 7 | 20 | $0.3316 |
| ✅ | 211_bash_process_memory_audit | 37.2s | 6 | 11 | $0.2397 |
| 🚧 | 212_bash_container_disk_audit | — | — | — | — |
| ✅ | 213_bash_network_connection_audit | 36.6s | 7 | 8 | $0.2331 |
| 🚧 | 214_bash_multipod_disk_check | — | — | — | — |
| ✅ | 215_bash_multipod_connectivity | 82.4s | 12 | 36 | $0.5380 |
| ✅ | 24_misconfigured_pvc | 34.3s ±0% | 5 | 14 | $0.2363 |
| ✅ | 43_current_datetime_from_prompt | 5.0s ±0% | 1 | — | $0.1062 |
| 🚧 | 61_exact_match_counting | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 38.7s avg | 5.8 avg | 14.4 avg | $2.8978 |
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%.
Historical Comparison Details
Filter: excluding branch 'claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE'
Status: Success - 60 test/model combinations loaded
Experiments compared (30):
- github-21562188338.2847.1 (branch:
claude/tag-prometheus-evals-regression-1aI8F) - github-21562018076.2844.1 (branch:
claude/tag-prometheus-evals-regression-1aI8F) - github-21561858196.2842.1 (branch:
claude/fix-mcp-server-icons-bK8Qd) - ...and 27 more
Comparison indicators:
±0%— diff under 10% (within noise threshold)↑N%/↓N%— diff 10-25%↑N%/↓N%— diff over 25% (significant)
📖 Legend
| Icon | Meaning |
|---|---|
| ✅ | The test was successful |
| ➖ | The test was skipped |
| The test failed but is known to be flaky or known to fail | |
| 🚧 | The test had a setup failure (not a code regression) |
| 🔧 | The test failed due to mock data issues (not a code regression) |
| 🚫 | The test was throttled by API rate limits/overload |
| ❌ | The test failed and should be fixed before merging the PR |
🔄 Re-run evals manually
⚠️ Warning:/evalcomments always run using the workflow from master, not from this PR branch. If you modified the GitHub Action (e.g., added secrets or env vars), those changes won't take effect.To test workflow changes, use the GitHub CLI or Actions UI instead:
gh workflow run eval-regression.yaml --repo HolmesGPT/holmesgpt --ref claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE -f markers=regression -f filter=
Option 1: Comment on this PR with /eval:
/eval
markers: regression
Or with more options (one per line):
/eval
model: gpt-4o
markers: regression
filter: 09_crashpod
iterations: 5
Run evals on a different branch (e.g., master) for comparison:
/eval
branch: master
markers: regression
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
model |
Model(s) to test (default: same as automatic runs) |
markers |
Pytest markers (no default - runs all tests!) |
filter |
Pytest -k filter (use /list to see valid eval names) |
iterations |
Number of runs, max 10 |
branch |
Run evals on a different branch (for cross-branch comparison) |
Quick re-run: Use /rerun to re-run the most recent /eval on this PR with the same parameters.
Option 2: Trigger via GitHub Actions UI → "Run workflow"
🏷️ Valid markers
bash-resource-checker, benchmark, chain-of-causation, compaction, confluence, context_window, coralogix, counting, database, datadog, datetime, easy, elasticsearch, embeds, frontend, grafana-dashboard, hard, integration, kafka, kubernetes, leaked-information, logs, loki, medium, metrics, network, newrelic, no-cicd, numerical, one-test, port-forward, prometheus, question-answer, regression, runbooks, slackbot, storage, toolset-limitation, traces, transparency
Commands: /eval · /rerun · /list
CLI: gh workflow run eval-regression.yaml --repo HolmesGPT/holmesgpt --ref claude/bash-resource-checker-evals-fSHoE -f markers=regression -f filter=
|
✅ Docker image ready for
Use this tag to pull the image for testing. 📋 Copy commandsgcloud auth configure-docker us-central1-docker.pkg.dev
docker pull us-central1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/temporary-builds/holmes:91f7fc7
docker tag us-central1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/temporary-builds/holmes:91f7fc7 me-west1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/development/holmes-dev:91f7fc7
docker push me-west1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/development/holmes-dev:91f7fc7Patch Helm values in one line (choose the chart you use): HolmesGPT chart: helm upgrade --install holmesgpt ./helm/holmes \
--set registry=me-west1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/development \
--set image=holmes-dev:91f7fc7Robusta wrapper chart: helm upgrade --install robusta robusta/robusta \
--reuse-values \
--set holmes.registry=me-west1-docker.pkg.dev/robusta-development/development \
--set holmes.image=holmes-dev:91f7fc7 |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughAdds a pytest marker Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yaml`:
- Around line 3-7: The manifest uses a technical, non-unique resource name/label
"connection-pool" which can collide across tests; rename the metadata.name and
labels.app to a neutral, unique identifier that includes the test id (e.g.,
"app-213-<neutral-name>") and update any references to it in the associated
test_case.yaml so they match the new metadata.name and labels.app; ensure the
new name follows resource naming rules and is used consistently across the
manifest and test_case.yaml.
- Around line 12-44: The inline multi-line shell in the pod/container "command"
should be moved into a Kubernetes Secret and mounted as a file; create a Secret
(e.g., name orders-worker-213-script) with stringData.entrypoint.sh containing
the current script body, update the manifest to remove the inline "command"
block and instead mount that Secret as a volume (readOnly) and set the
container's command to run the mounted /path/to/entrypoint.sh (e.g., /bin/sh -c
/mnt/entrypoint.sh), ensure the Secret volume is referenced in the pod spec and
the script file has executable/newline-safe content and appropriate permissions
at runtime.
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml`:
- Line 1: Update the user_prompt and any kubectl references that mention the old
pod name "connection-pool" to use the neutral, unique pod name used in the
manifest (the renamed pod referenced elsewhere in this test); locate the
user_prompt entry in
test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml and replace
occurrences of "connection-pool" (and any other hard-coded references in the
same file) so they exactly match the manifest's pod name used by functions that
query pods (e.g., any kubectl commands or variables that reference the pod), and
apply the same rename to the other occurrences noted in this test (the other
similar prompt/command entries).
- Around line 3-10: Update the test fixture by replacing the generic
expected_output items with concrete, discoverable assertions (e.g., exact TCP
state counts and explicit port listings such as "LISTEN on ports 8001-8005: 3
entries" or "ESTABLISHED connections: 7" and specific kubectl exec invocation
text), and then remove or set include_tool_calls to false; reference the keys
expected_output and include_tool_calls in
test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml to locate and
change the entries.
- Around line 45-48: The LISTEN_COUNT assignment in the loop uses `grep -c
LISTEN || echo "0"` which can produce duplicate zeros when grep exits non-zero;
update the command substitution used to set LISTEN_COUNT (the line assigning
LISTEN_COUNT in the for loop that runs `kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool
-- ss -tln`) to suppress the non-zero exit without emitting an extra "0" by
replacing `grep -c LISTEN || echo "0"` with `grep -c LISTEN || true`, so
LISTEN_COUNT contains only the grep output and the subsequent numeric comparison
(`[ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ]`) won't fail.
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/212_bash_container_disk_audit/manifest.yaml (2)
12-32: Consider using a Kubernetes Secret for the initialization script.As per coding guidelines, scripts in test infrastructure should be stored in Kubernetes Secrets rather than inline in manifests. While the current inline approach works, extracting the script to a Secret would improve consistency with the project's established patterns.
8-39: Optional: Add security context to harden the test pod.The static analysis flags
allowPrivilegeEscalationand running as root. For a test fixture in an isolated namespace, this is low risk, but adding a security context would align with security best practices:🛡️ Optional security hardening
spec: + securityContext: + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 1000 containers: - name: worker image: alpine:3.19 + securityContext: + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + readOnlyRootFilesystem: false command:tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/211_bash_process_memory_audit/manifest.yaml (2)
12-35: Consider using a Kubernetes Secret for the initialization script.Same as the 212 fixture - the guideline recommends using Secrets for scripts in test infrastructure rather than inline manifests.
8-42: Optional: Add security context to harden the test pod.Same security hardening opportunity as the 212 fixture. For test pods, this is optional but aligns with best practices flagged by static analysis (CKV_K8S_20, CKV_K8S_23).
🛡️ Optional security hardening
spec: + securityContext: + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 1000 containers: - name: worker image: python:3.11-alpine + securityContext: + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false command:tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yaml (1)
10-18: Optional: Add security context to harden test pods.Static analysis flags that pods can run with privilege escalation and as root. While acceptable for ephemeral test fixtures, adding a security context would align with best practices.
🛡️ Example security context for one pod
spec: containers: - name: worker image: alpine:3.19 command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1K count=100 2>/dev/null; sleep 3600"] resources: limits: memory: "64Mi" cpu: "100m" + securityContext: + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 1000tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/215_bash_multipod_connectivity/manifest.yaml (1)
11-26: Optional: Add security context to harden test pods.Same as other manifests - static analysis flags privilege escalation and root containers. Consider adding
securityContextfor best practices, though acceptable for ephemeral test fixtures.tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yaml (1)
1-8: Consider adding small shared infra components for a more realistic topology.
This fixture currently provisions a single pod; if the suite expects realistic architecture, add a small log aggregation component (e.g., Loki) with separation of concerns.As per coding guidelines: Implement realistic full architecture in test infrastructure (e.g., use Loki for log aggregation) with proper separation of concerns.
| metadata: | ||
| name: connection-pool | ||
| namespace: app-213 | ||
| labels: | ||
| app: connection-pool |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename the pod/label to a neutral, unique identifier.
connection-pool is a hint‑giving technical name and may collide across tests; use a neutral business‑context name with the test id and update references in test_case.yaml accordingly.
🔁 Suggested rename
metadata:
- name: connection-pool
+ name: orders-worker-213
namespace: app-213
labels:
- app: connection-pool
+ app: orders-worker-213As per coding guidelines: All resource names must be unique across tests to prevent conflicts when tests run simultaneously; Never use obvious or hint-giving resource names in tests - use neutral, business-context names instead of technical indicators.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| metadata: | |
| name: connection-pool | |
| namespace: app-213 | |
| labels: | |
| app: connection-pool | |
| metadata: | |
| name: orders-worker-213 | |
| namespace: app-213 | |
| labels: | |
| app: orders-worker-213 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yaml`
around lines 3 - 7, The manifest uses a technical, non-unique resource
name/label "connection-pool" which can collide across tests; rename the
metadata.name and labels.app to a neutral, unique identifier that includes the
test id (e.g., "app-213-<neutral-name>") and update any references to it in the
associated test_case.yaml so they match the new metadata.name and labels.app;
ensure the new name follows resource naming rules and is used consistently
across the manifest and test_case.yaml.
| command: | ||
| - /bin/sh | ||
| - -c | ||
| - | | ||
| # Install netcat and iproute2 for ss | ||
| apk add --no-cache netcat-openbsd iproute2 >/dev/null 2>&1 | ||
|
|
||
| # Create 50 TCP listeners on ports 8001-8050 | ||
| for port in $(seq 8001 8050); do | ||
| # Use while loop to keep listener alive after connection | ||
| while true; do nc -l -p $port; done & | ||
| done | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Created 50 TCP listeners" | ||
|
|
||
| # Wait a moment for listeners to start | ||
| sleep 2 | ||
|
|
||
| # Create connections to each listener (these will be ESTABLISHED) | ||
| for port in $(seq 8001 8050); do | ||
| # Keep connection open by sleeping after connect | ||
| (sleep 3600 | nc 127.0.0.1 $port) & | ||
| done | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Created 50 client connections" | ||
|
|
||
| # Show connection summary | ||
| sleep 2 | ||
| echo "Connection states:" | ||
| ss -tan | head -20 | ||
|
|
||
| # Keep container running | ||
| sleep 3600 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
cd tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit && \
cat -n manifest.yamlRepository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 1731
Move the startup script to a Kubernetes Secret.
The inline script in the container command violates test infrastructure policy. Create a Secret and mount it as a volume instead.
Suggested structure
spec:
+ volumes:
+ - name: entrypoint
+ secret:
+ secretName: orders-worker-213-script
containers:
- name: worker
image: alpine:3.19
- command:
- - /bin/sh
- - -c
- - |
- # Install netcat and iproute2 for ss
- apk add --no-cache netcat-openbsd iproute2 >/dev/null 2>&1
- ...
+ command: ["/bin/sh", "/scripts/entrypoint.sh"]
+ volumeMounts:
+ - name: entrypoint
+ mountPath: /scripts
+ readOnly: trueapiVersion: v1
kind: Secret
metadata:
name: orders-worker-213-script
namespace: app-213
stringData:
entrypoint.sh: |
# (move the current script body here)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yaml`
around lines 12 - 44, The inline multi-line shell in the pod/container "command"
should be moved into a Kubernetes Secret and mounted as a file; create a Secret
(e.g., name orders-worker-213-script) with stringData.entrypoint.sh containing
the current script body, update the manifest to remove the inline "command"
block and instead mount that Secret as a volume (readOnly) and set the
container's command to run the mounted /path/to/entrypoint.sh (e.g., /bin/sh -c
/mnt/entrypoint.sh), ensure the Secret volume is referenced in the pod spec and
the script file has executable/newline-safe content and appropriate permissions
at runtime.
| @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ | |||
| user_prompt: "The connection-pool pod in namespace app-213 may have connection leaks. Check how many TCP connections it has and group them by state (ESTABLISHED, TIME_WAIT, LISTEN, etc.)." | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Align pod references with the neutral, unique name.
Update the prompt and kubectl references to match the renamed pod from the manifest.
🔁 Suggested rename alignment
-user_prompt: "The connection-pool pod in namespace app-213 may have connection leaks. Check how many TCP connections it has and group them by state (ESTABLISHED, TIME_WAIT, LISTEN, etc.)."
+user_prompt: "The orders-worker-213 pod in namespace app-213 may have connection leaks. Check how many TCP connections it has and group them by state (ESTABLISHED, TIME_WAIT, LISTEN, etc.)."
- if kubectl wait --for=condition=ready pod/connection-pool -n app-213 --timeout=2s 2>/dev/null; then
+ if kubectl wait --for=condition=ready pod/orders-worker-213 -n app-213 --timeout=2s 2>/dev/null; then
- kubectl describe pod/connection-pool -n app-213
+ kubectl describe pod/orders-worker-213 -n app-213
- kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tan
+ kubectl exec -n app-213 orders-worker-213 -- ss -tanAs per coding guidelines: All resource names must be unique across tests to prevent conflicts when tests run simultaneously; Never use obvious or hint-giving resource names in tests - use neutral, business-context names instead of technical indicators.
Also applies to: 28-28, 39-39, 58-58
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml`
at line 1, Update the user_prompt and any kubectl references that mention the
old pod name "connection-pool" to use the neutral, unique pod name used in the
manifest (the renamed pod referenced elsewhere in this test); locate the
user_prompt entry in
test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml and replace
occurrences of "connection-pool" (and any other hard-coded references in the
same file) so they exactly match the manifest's pod name used by functions that
query pods (e.g., any kubectl commands or variables that reference the pod), and
apply the same rename to the other occurrences noted in this test (the other
similar prompt/command entries).
| include_tool_calls: true | ||
|
|
||
| expected_output: | ||
| - "Must call bash tool with kubectl exec" | ||
| - "Must report TCP connection states" | ||
| - "Must identify LISTEN connections on ports 8001-8050" | ||
| - "Must identify ESTABLISHED connections" | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Make expected_output specific; then drop include_tool_calls.
The current expectations are generic. Encode concrete counts/port ranges to be hallucination‑proof; once specific, include_tool_calls can be false.
✅ Example expectations
-include_tool_calls: true
+include_tool_calls: false
expected_output:
- - "Must call bash tool with kubectl exec"
- - "Must report TCP connection states"
- - "Must identify LISTEN connections on ports 8001-8050"
- - "Must identify ESTABLISHED connections"
+ - "Uses kubectl exec with bash against pod orders-worker-213"
+ - "Reports LISTEN sockets on ports 8001-8050 (≈50)"
+ - "Reports ESTABLISHED connections to 127.0.0.1:8001-8050 (≈50)"
+ - "Groups results by state (LISTEN/ESTABLISHED/TIME_WAIT)"As per coding guidelines: Use specific, discoverable values in expected_output instead of generic patterns to rule out hallucinations; Use 'include_tool_calls: true' in test configuration only when expected output values are too generic to be hallucination-proof.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| include_tool_calls: true | |
| expected_output: | |
| - "Must call bash tool with kubectl exec" | |
| - "Must report TCP connection states" | |
| - "Must identify LISTEN connections on ports 8001-8050" | |
| - "Must identify ESTABLISHED connections" | |
| include_tool_calls: false | |
| expected_output: | |
| - "Uses kubectl exec with bash against pod orders-worker-213" | |
| - "Reports LISTEN sockets on ports 8001-8050 (≈50)" | |
| - "Reports ESTABLISHED connections to 127.0.0.1:8001-8050 (≈50)" | |
| - "Groups results by state (LISTEN/ESTABLISHED/TIME_WAIT)" |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml`
around lines 3 - 10, Update the test fixture by replacing the generic
expected_output items with concrete, discoverable assertions (e.g., exact TCP
state counts and explicit port listings such as "LISTEN on ports 8001-8005: 3
entries" or "ESTABLISHED connections: 7" and specific kubectl exec invocation
text), and then remove or set include_tool_calls to false; reference the keys
expected_output and include_tool_calls in
test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml to locate and
change the entries.
| for i in {1..30}; do | ||
| LISTEN_COUNT=$(kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tln 2>/dev/null | grep -c LISTEN || echo "0") | ||
| echo "Attempt $i: $LISTEN_COUNT LISTEN connections" | ||
| if [ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ]; then |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
cat -n tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml | head -60Repository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 2380
🏁 Script executed:
find tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit -type f -name "*.yaml" -o -name "*.yml"Repository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 312
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if there's a fixture definition or infrastructure file for this test
find tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit -type fRepository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 312
🏁 Script executed:
cat tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yamlRepository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 1374
🏁 Script executed:
# Let me verify the grep -c behavior to understand if the claim about double-zero output is accurate
cat > /tmp/test_grep.sh << 'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
# Test 1: grep -c on non-empty output
echo "Test 1: grep -c with matches"
echo -e "LISTEN\nLISTEN\nESTABLISHED" | grep -c "LISTEN"
echo "---"
# Test 2: grep -c on empty output
echo "Test 2: grep -c with no matches (should print 0)"
echo -e "ESTABLISHED\nTIME_WAIT" | grep -c "LISTEN"
echo "---"
# Test 3: Original command pattern with || echo "0"
echo "Test 3: With || echo '0' when grep returns 0"
LISTEN_COUNT=$(echo -e "ESTABLISHED\nTIME_WAIT" | grep -c "LISTEN" || echo "0")
echo "LISTEN_COUNT='$LISTEN_COUNT'"
echo "---"
# Test 4: Check if there are multiple lines
echo "Test 4: Checking raw output with set -x"
set -x
LISTEN_COUNT=$(echo -e "ESTABLISHED\nTIME_WAIT" | grep -c "LISTEN" || echo "0")
set +x
echo "Final value: $LISTEN_COUNT"
echo "---"
# Test 5: Check with failed command
echo "Test 5: With command that fails"
LISTEN_COUNT=$(/bin/false | grep -c "LISTEN" || echo "0")
echo "LISTEN_COUNT='$LISTEN_COUNT'"
EOF
bash /tmp/test_grep.shRepository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 443
🏁 Script executed:
cat tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/manifest.yaml | grep -A 5 "metadata:" | grep "name:"Repository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 86
Remove redundant echo fallback in LISTEN_COUNT assignment.
The pipe grep -c LISTEN || echo "0" outputs double zero (0\n0) because grep -c exits with code 1 when no matches are found, triggering the fallback echo. This causes [ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ] to fail with "integer expression expected". Use || true instead to suppress the non-zero exit without duplicating output:
🔧 Fixed assignment
- LISTEN_COUNT=$(kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tln 2>/dev/null | grep -c LISTEN || echo "0")
+ LISTEN_COUNT=$(kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tln 2>/dev/null | grep -c LISTEN || true)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| for i in {1..30}; do | |
| LISTEN_COUNT=$(kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tln 2>/dev/null | grep -c LISTEN || echo "0") | |
| echo "Attempt $i: $LISTEN_COUNT LISTEN connections" | |
| if [ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ]; then | |
| for i in {1..30}; do | |
| LISTEN_COUNT=$(kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool -- ss -tln 2>/dev/null | grep -c LISTEN || true) | |
| echo "Attempt $i: $LISTEN_COUNT LISTEN connections" | |
| if [ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ]; then |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/213_bash_network_connection_audit/test_case.yaml`
around lines 45 - 48, The LISTEN_COUNT assignment in the loop uses `grep -c
LISTEN || echo "0"` which can produce duplicate zeros when grep exits non-zero;
update the command substitution used to set LISTEN_COUNT (the line assigning
LISTEN_COUNT in the for loop that runs `kubectl exec -n app-213 connection-pool
-- ss -tln`) to suppress the non-zero exit without emitting an extra "0" by
replacing `grep -c LISTEN || echo "0"` with `grep -c LISTEN || true`, so
LISTEN_COUNT contains only the grep output and the subsequent numeric comparison
(`[ "$LISTEN_COUNT" -ge 40 ]`) won't fail.
Using /dev/urandom to create 150MB of files is slow and likely caused setup timeout. /dev/zero is much faster and still works for testing file size detection. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Update tests 214 and 215 to explicitly require bash for-loops in the command. These tests should FAIL until the bash toolset supports loop constructs. - User prompt now explicitly asks for a bash script with for-loop - Expected output checks that command contains loop syntax - Expected output fails if Holmes makes separate tool calls per pod This is TDD: tests define the desired behavior and fail until implemented. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tests 214 & 215 now deploy 100 pods instead of 10. Making 100 individual kubectl exec calls is impractical, so Holmes must write a bash loop. Since bash toolset blocks loops, tests will fail naturally. - Natural prompts (no artificial "write a for-loop" requirement) - 214: 100 cache-worker pods (90 small, 10 large /tmp) - 215: 100 api-worker pods (90 allowed, 10 blocked by NetworkPolicy) - Uses StatefulSet for efficient deployment https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yaml`:
- Around line 6-29: The manifest uses the technical, non-unique resource name
"cache-worker" in multiple places (metadata.name, StatefulSet name, serviceName,
selector app label and template labels); rename all occurrences to a neutral,
test-unique name that includes the test id (for example a business-context token
plus "214") so names are globally unique, and update the selector keys
(matchLabels/app), pod template labels, and any hostname parsing or references
in the test_case fixture to use the new name consistently (ensure metadata.name,
spec.serviceName, spec.selector.matchLabels, and template.metadata.labels all
match the new identifier).
- Around line 34-44: The startup shell script is inlined in the container args
(the block that sets POD_ID, writes /tmp/cache.dat, and sleeps) which violates
the guideline; extract that script into a Kubernetes Secret (e.g., key
startup.sh containing the POD_ID logic and dd commands writing /tmp/cache.dat),
update the Pod spec to mount the Secret as a volume and run the mounted script
from the container (replace the inline args with a command that executes the
mounted script), and ensure the test runner has RBAC to create and mount Secrets
in the app-214 namespace so the Secret can be created and the volume mounted at
runtime.
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/215_bash_multipod_connectivity/test_case.yaml`:
- Around line 9-12: Update the test description string that contains the
contradictory sentence "Holmes needs to write a bash script with a loop, but
bash toolset blocks loops." to clearly state the intended scenario: indicate
whether this is an intentionally failing TDD test, whether the bash toolset
actually allows loops (remove “blocks loops” if outdated), or describe the
alternative approach Holmes should use (e.g., parallel kubectl exec via xargs or
a provided multipod helper). Edit the YAML description field so it unambiguously
reflects one of the three options and mention the expected outcome for pods 0-89
vs 90-99.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/215_bash_multipod_connectivity/manifest.yaml (1)
103-273: Consider using a second StatefulSet for blocked pods.These 10 identical pod definitions could be consolidated into a StatefulSet without the
db-accesslabel, reducing ~170 lines to ~30 lines while maintaining the same test behavior.♻️ Suggested refactor using StatefulSet
-# 10 individual pods WITHOUT db-access label (blocked by NetworkPolicy) -# Named api-worker-90 through api-worker-99 to continue the sequence -apiVersion: v1 -kind: Pod -metadata: - name: api-worker-90 - namespace: app-215 - labels: - app: api-worker -spec: - containers: - - name: worker - image: alpine:3.19 - command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "apk add --no-cache netcat-openbsd >/dev/null 2>&1; sleep 3600"] - resources: - limits: - memory: "64Mi" - cpu: "50m" -# ... (remaining 9 pods removed) +# StatefulSet: 10 worker pods WITHOUT db-access label (blocked by NetworkPolicy) +apiVersion: v1 +kind: Service +metadata: + name: blocked-worker + namespace: app-215 +spec: + clusterIP: None + selector: + app: blocked-worker +--- +apiVersion: apps/v1 +kind: StatefulSet +metadata: + name: blocked-worker + namespace: app-215 +spec: + serviceName: blocked-worker + replicas: 10 + podManagementPolicy: Parallel + selector: + matchLabels: + app: blocked-worker + template: + metadata: + labels: + app: blocked-worker + spec: + containers: + - name: worker + image: alpine:3.19 + command: ["/bin/sh", "-c", "apk add --no-cache netcat-openbsd >/dev/null 2>&1; sleep 3600"] + resources: + limits: + memory: "64Mi" + cpu: "50m" + requests: + memory: "32Mi" + cpu: "10m"Note: This would require updating
test_case.yamlto referenceblocked-worker-0throughblocked-worker-9instead ofapi-worker-90throughapi-worker-99.tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yaml (2)
31-33: Add a restrictive securityContext to avoid PSA/OPA rejections.If your test clusters enforce restricted policies, lack of
runAsNonRoot/allowPrivilegeEscalation: falsemay block pod admission.🔒 Suggested hardening
containers: - name: worker image: alpine:3.19 + securityContext: + allowPrivilegeEscalation: false + runAsNonRoot: true + runAsUser: 1000 command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
45-51: Consider lowering CPU/memory limits for 100 pods.This workload writes files then sleeps; with 100 replicas, trimming limits/requests reduces test footprint.
♻️ Example reduction
resources: limits: - memory: "128Mi" - cpu: "50m" + memory: "64Mi" + cpu: "25m" requests: - memory: "32Mi" - cpu: "10m" + memory: "16Mi" + cpu: "5m"As per coding guidelines, Use minimal resource footprints in test services by reducing memory and CPU allocations.
tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/test_case.yaml (1)
1-8: Make expected_output more concrete so include_tool_calls can be dropped.Right now the assertions are high-level; consider listing specific pod/size outputs (or a representative subset) so the check is hallucination-resistant and you can set
include_tool_calls: falseunless you truly need tool-call inspection.✍️ Example tightening
-include_tool_calls: true +include_tool_calls: false expected_output: - - "Must identify cache-worker-90 through cache-worker-99 as having high disk usage" - - "Must check all 100 pods" + - "cache-worker-90 through cache-worker-99 should each report ~60MB in /tmp (e.g., cache-worker-90: 60M)" + - "cache-worker-0 through cache-worker-89 should each report ~100KB in /tmp" + - "Output should confirm total pods checked: 100"Based on learnings, Use specific, discoverable values in expected_output instead of generic patterns to rule out hallucinations; Use 'include_tool_calls: true' in test configuration only when expected output values are too generic to be hallucination-proof.
| metadata: | ||
| name: cache-worker | ||
| namespace: app-214 | ||
| spec: | ||
| clusterIP: None | ||
| selector: | ||
| app: cache-worker | ||
| --- | ||
| apiVersion: apps/v1 | ||
| kind: StatefulSet | ||
| metadata: | ||
| name: cache-worker | ||
| namespace: app-214 | ||
| spec: | ||
| serviceName: cache-worker | ||
| replicas: 100 | ||
| podManagementPolicy: Parallel | ||
| selector: | ||
| matchLabels: | ||
| app: cache-worker | ||
| template: | ||
| metadata: | ||
| labels: | ||
| app: cache-worker |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rename resources to neutral, test-unique names (include the test id).
cache-worker is both technical/hinting and not unique across tests. Please switch to a neutral, business-context name with the test id and update selectors plus hostname parsing accordingly (and then update references in the test_case fixture).
🛠️ Example rename (adjust consistently across this fixture)
metadata:
- name: cache-worker
+ name: ledger-worker-214
namespace: app-214
spec:
clusterIP: None
selector:
- app: cache-worker
+ app: ledger-worker-214
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
- name: cache-worker
+ name: ledger-worker-214
namespace: app-214
spec:
- serviceName: cache-worker
+ serviceName: ledger-worker-214
replicas: 100
podManagementPolicy: Parallel
selector:
matchLabels:
- app: cache-worker
+ app: ledger-worker-214
template:
metadata:
labels:
- app: cache-worker
+ app: ledger-worker-214
spec:
containers:
- name: worker
image: alpine:3.19
command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
args:
- |
- POD_ID=$(hostname | sed 's/cache-worker-//')
+ POD_ID=$(hostname | sed 's/ledger-worker-214-//')As per coding guidelines, All resource names must be unique across tests to prevent conflicts when tests run simultaneously; Never use obvious or hint-giving resource names in tests - use neutral, business-context names instead of technical indicators.
Also applies to: 37-43
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yaml`
around lines 6 - 29, The manifest uses the technical, non-unique resource name
"cache-worker" in multiple places (metadata.name, StatefulSet name, serviceName,
selector app label and template labels); rename all occurrences to a neutral,
test-unique name that includes the test id (for example a business-context token
plus "214") so names are globally unique, and update the selector keys
(matchLabels/app), pod template labels, and any hostname parsing or references
in the test_case fixture to use the new name consistently (ensure metadata.name,
spec.serviceName, spec.selector.matchLabels, and template.metadata.labels all
match the new identifier).
| command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"] | ||
| args: | ||
| - | | ||
| POD_ID=$(hostname | sed 's/cache-worker-//') | ||
| # Pods 90-99 get large files (60MB), others get small (100KB) | ||
| if [ "$POD_ID" -ge 90 ]; then | ||
| dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1M count=60 2>/dev/null | ||
| else | ||
| dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1K count=100 2>/dev/null | ||
| fi | ||
| sleep 3600 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's check if the file exists and read its content
cat tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yamlRepository: HolmesGPT/holmesgpt
Length of output: 1343
Store the startup script in a Kubernetes Secret instead of inline args.
This manifest violates the test-infrastructure guideline: scripts must be stored in Secrets, not inline. The current implementation also makes the script harder to reuse and test independently.
Create a Secret with the script content and mount it as a volume, then verify the test runner's RBAC allows Secret creation/mounting in the app-214 namespace.
🛠️ Proposed fix (Secret-mounted script)
+apiVersion: v1
+kind: Secret
+metadata:
+ name: cache-worker-script
+ namespace: app-214
+type: Opaque
+stringData:
+ start.sh: |
+ POD_ID=$(hostname | sed 's/cache-worker-//')
+ if [ "$POD_ID" -ge 90 ]; then
+ dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1M count=60 2>/dev/null
+ else
+ dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1K count=100 2>/dev/null
+ fi
+ sleep 3600
+---
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: cache-worker
namespace: app-214
spec:
clusterIP: None
selector:
app: cache-worker
---
apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: StatefulSet
metadata:
name: cache-worker
namespace: app-214
spec:
serviceName: cache-worker
replicas: 100
podManagementPolicy: Parallel
selector:
matchLabels:
app: cache-worker
template:
metadata:
labels:
app: cache-worker
spec:
containers:
- name: worker
image: alpine:3.19
- command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
- args:
- - |
- POD_ID=$(hostname | sed 's/cache-worker-//')
- # Pods 90-99 get large files (60MB), others get small (100KB)
- if [ "$POD_ID" -ge 90 ]; then
- dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1M count=60 2>/dev/null
- else
- dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/cache.dat bs=1K count=100 2>/dev/null
- fi
- sleep 3600
+ command: ["/bin/sh", "/scripts/start.sh"]
+ volumeMounts:
+ - name: script
+ mountPath: /scripts
+ readOnly: true
resources:
limits:
memory: "128Mi"
cpu: "50m"
requests:
memory: "32Mi"
cpu: "10m"
+ volumes:
+ - name: script
+ secret:
+ secretName: cache-worker-script
+ defaultMode: 0555🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/214_bash_multipod_disk_check/manifest.yaml`
around lines 34 - 44, The startup shell script is inlined in the container args
(the block that sets POD_ID, writes /tmp/cache.dat, and sleeps) which violates
the guideline; extract that script into a Kubernetes Secret (e.g., key
startup.sh containing the POD_ID logic and dd commands writing /tmp/cache.dat),
update the Pod spec to mount the Secret as a volume and run the mounted script
from the container (replace the inline args with a command that executes the
mounted script), and ensure the test runner has RBAC to create and mount Secrets
in the app-214 namespace so the Secret can be created and the volume mounted at
runtime.
| description: | | ||
| TDD test: 100 worker pods deployed - too many for individual kubectl exec calls. | ||
| Holmes needs to write a bash script with a loop, but bash toolset blocks loops. | ||
| Pods 0-89 can reach database, pods 90-99 are blocked by NetworkPolicy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Clarify the contradictory description.
Line 11 states: "Holmes needs to write a bash script with a loop, but bash toolset blocks loops."
This reads as contradictory—if loops are blocked, how can Holmes accomplish the task? Please clarify whether:
- This is intentionally a failing TDD test scenario
- The toolset configuration allows loops (and the description is outdated)
- There's an alternative approach Holmes should use
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
`@tests/llm/fixtures/test_ask_holmes/215_bash_multipod_connectivity/test_case.yaml`
around lines 9 - 12, Update the test description string that contains the
contradictory sentence "Holmes needs to write a bash script with a loop, but
bash toolset blocks loops." to clearly state the intended scenario: indicate
whether this is an intentionally failing TDD test, whether the bash toolset
actually allows loops (remove “blocks loops” if outdated), or describe the
alternative approach Holmes should use (e.g., parallel kubectl exec via xargs or
a provided multipod helper). Edit the YAML description field so it unambiguously
reflects one of the three options and mention the expected outcome for pods 0-89
vs 90-99.
Bad pods now use formula (ordinal*7+3)%11==0, creating scattered pattern: pods 1, 12, 23, 34, 45, 56, 67, 78, 89 (9 pods spread across 100) Holmes CANNOT: - Guess which pods are bad - Sample strategically - Check just high-numbered pods Holmes MUST check every pod to find all 9 scattered bad pods. Without bash loops, this will fail/timeout. https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj Signed-off-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
/eval |
|
@aantn Your eval run has finished. ✅ Completed successfully 🧪 Manual Eval Results
Results of HolmesGPT evals
Time/Cost columns show % change vs historical average (↑slower/costlier, ↓faster/cheaper). Changes under 10% shown as ±0%. Historical Comparison DetailsFilter: excluding branch 'master' Status: Success - 21 test/model combinations loaded Experiments compared (30):
Comparison indicators:
📖 Legend
🔄 Re-run evals manually
Option 1: Comment on this PR with Or with more options (one per line): Run evals on a different branch (e.g., master) for comparison:
Quick re-run: Use Option 2: Trigger via GitHub Actions UI → "Run workflow" 🏷️ Valid markers
Commands: CLI: |
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Implements 5 new eval tests that require bash scripting with kubectl exec:
These tests verify Holmes can use the bash toolset to inspect in-container
state that no existing toolset can access (processes, filesystem, network).
Also adds bash-resource-checker pytest marker to pyproject.toml.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01H2cRJG4a2oz7qB2gKPhrQj
Signed-off-by: Claude noreply@anthropic.com
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.