Make benchmarks more prominent in docs - #1030
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@aantn has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughAdds/updates documentation navigation and evaluation metadata, removes a mock-data doc, adds built-in toolset entries, adjusts evaluation guidance, and simplifies evaluation ordering in the report generator to alphabetical sorting. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant User
participant Generator as generate_eval_report.py
participant Files as Eval result files
participant Output as Markdown heatmap
User->>Generator: run script
Generator->>Files: load evaluation entries
Generator-->>Generator: collect all_evals
alt previous: complex priority sort (removed)
Generator-->>Generator: (old) apply multi-criteria priority sort
else new:
Generator-->>Generator: sort eval names alphabetically
end
Generator-->>Generator: sort models (existing logic)
Generator->>Output: render heatmap/table using new ordering
Output-->>User: report produced
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
docs/data-sources/builtin-toolsets/.nav.yml(1 hunks)docs/data-sources/builtin-toolsets/cilium.md(1 hunks)docs/data-sources/builtin-toolsets/index.md(1 hunks)docs/development/.nav.yml(1 hunks)docs/development/evaluations/adding-evals.md(2 hunks)docs/index.md(1 hunks)docs/using-mock-data.md(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- docs/using-mock-data.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- docs/data-sources/builtin-toolsets/cilium.md
- docs/development/.nav.yml
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/**/*.md
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
In MkDocs docs, always add a blank line between a header/bold text and a following list to render correctly
Files:
docs/index.mddocs/data-sources/builtin-toolsets/index.mddocs/development/evaluations/adding-evals.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Pre-commit checks
- GitHub Check: llm_evals
...by linking to them from the homepage and main menu.
Also: