-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
truncation level of lists #1917
truncation level of lists #1917
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, while it's unrelated to this PR, the list_pentagon
result would fit better in Classes/implementations/list.v, right after app_assoc
, as then this file wouldn't need to Require list.v.
@jdchristensen I might do another cleanup after this where I move all the stuff in |
Sounds fine. I guess that would mean that this file will still depend on some of the Classes library, then. Hmm, I just noticed that the existing list.v only needs canonical_names.v, not abstract_algebra.v, so that's a change that can also be made. |
I'm gonna remove the extra functions I added and leave that for the cleanup. I'll just keep the proof of the truncation level available here. |
<!-- ps-id: be8baae8-7652-48c2-b90d-d5e4f6748147 --> Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ali Caglayan <[email protected]>
e16ad63
to
ece8fa6
Compare
LGTM. |
We add
some more list functions anda proof thatn.+2
truncated types given.+2
truncated lists.