Skip to content

tests(nano): test actions order#1354

Merged
glevco merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
tests/nano/actions-order
Aug 22, 2025
Merged

tests(nano): test actions order#1354
glevco merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
tests/nano/actions-order

Conversation

@glevco
Copy link
Contributor

@glevco glevco commented Aug 12, 2025

Motivation

Improve nano tests by making sure sending actions in different orders doesn't impact the final result.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Update test_actions.py to run tests with different action orders in tests with more than one action.

Checklist

  • If you are requesting a merge into master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged

@glevco glevco self-assigned this Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from Todo to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco force-pushed the tests/nano/actions-order branch from e8a24fa to f6db422 Compare August 12, 2025 14:21
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 12, 2025

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchtests/nano/actions-order
Testbedubuntu-22.04
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
minutes (m)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
minutes (m)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
minutes (m)
(Limit %)
sync-v2 (up to 20000 blocks)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1.85 m
(+11.07%)Baseline: 1.67 m
1.50 m
(81.03%)
2.00 m
(92.56%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.65%. Comparing base (c10ec87) to head (aa75eb8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1354      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.63%   85.65%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         429      429              
  Lines       32450    32450              
  Branches     5068     5068              
==========================================
+ Hits        27790    27794       +4     
+ Misses       3631     3630       -1     
+ Partials     1029     1026       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@glevco glevco moved this from In Progress (Done) to In Progress (WIP) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from In Progress (WIP) to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from In Progress (Done) to In Progress (WIP) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from In Progress (WIP) to In Review (Done) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco assigned glevco and unassigned glevco Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from In Review (Done) to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network Aug 12, 2025
@glevco glevco force-pushed the tests/nano/actions-order branch 2 times, most recently from e216293 to 786efb7 Compare August 19, 2025 13:55
@glevco glevco moved this from In Progress (Done) to In Review (WIP) in Hathor Network Aug 19, 2025
@glevco glevco force-pushed the tests/nano/actions-order branch from 786efb7 to 2eb1a25 Compare August 20, 2025 14:58
@glevco glevco moved this from In Review (WIP) to In Review (Done) in Hathor Network Aug 20, 2025
@glevco glevco force-pushed the tests/nano/actions-order branch from 2eb1a25 to aa75eb8 Compare August 21, 2025 19:47
@glevco glevco merged commit 7707b6c into master Aug 22, 2025
8 checks passed
@glevco glevco deleted the tests/nano/actions-order branch August 22, 2025 11:35
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review (Done) to Waiting to be deployed in Hathor Network Aug 22, 2025
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2025
2 tasks
@jansegre jansegre moved this from Waiting to be deployed to Done in Hathor Network Sep 18, 2025
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request Sep 24, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants