Skip to content

fix: update python-rocksdb#1244

Merged
glevco merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/update-python-rocksdb
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

fix: update python-rocksdb#1244
glevco merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/update-python-rocksdb

Conversation

@glevco
Copy link
Contributor

@glevco glevco commented Mar 19, 2025

Motivation

macOS CI is currently failing on master because rocksdb bindings are outdated. This PR fixes this.

Acceptance Criteria

  • Update python-rocksdb to the latest commit.

Checklist

  • If you are requesting a merge into master, confirm this code is production-ready and can be included in future releases as soon as it gets merged

@glevco glevco added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 19, 2025
@glevco glevco requested review from luislhl and msbrogli March 19, 2025 14:42
@glevco glevco self-assigned this Mar 19, 2025
@glevco glevco requested a review from jansegre as a code owner March 19, 2025 14:42
@glevco glevco moved this from Todo to In Progress (Done) in Hathor Network Mar 19, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchfix/update-python-rocksdb
Testbedubuntu-22.04
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
minutes (m)
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
minutes (m)
(Limit %)
Upper Boundary
minutes (m)
(Limit %)
sync-v2 (up to 20000 blocks)📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1.61 m
(-1.47%)Baseline: 1.63 m
1.47 m
(91.34%)
1.80 m
(89.58%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.09%. Comparing base (80c5ae3) to head (48d4902).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1244      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.14%   84.09%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         311      311              
  Lines       23868    23868              
  Branches     3651     3651              
==========================================
- Hits        20083    20071      -12     
- Misses       3071     3077       +6     
- Partials      714      720       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@luislhl luislhl moved this from In Progress (Done) to In Review (WIP) in Hathor Network Mar 19, 2025
@glevco glevco moved this from In Review (WIP) to In Review (Done) in Hathor Network Mar 19, 2025
@glevco glevco merged commit f534d0d into master Mar 19, 2025
10 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review (Done) to Waiting to be deployed in Hathor Network Mar 19, 2025
@glevco glevco deleted the fix/update-python-rocksdb branch March 19, 2025 15:48
jansegre added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2025
Even if #1244 has updated the resolved_reference, it seems it didn't do
a complete update (python-rocksdb version was still marked as 0.9.2
instead of 0.9.3). The lock file was generated with poetry-2.1.1, and
thus includes some new fields.

The only downside of not doing this change seems to be that in
development setups where python-rocksdb v0.9.2 exists in the cache, it
will be used instead of correctly installing the one from github with
version v0.9.3.
jansegre added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
Even if #1244 has updated the resolved_reference, it seems it didn't do
a complete update (python-rocksdb version was still marked as 0.9.2
instead of 0.9.3). The lock file was generated with poetry-2.1.1, and
thus includes some new fields.

The only downside of not doing this change seems to be that in
development setups where python-rocksdb v0.9.2 exists in the cache, it
will be used instead of correctly installing the one from github with
version v0.9.3.
jansegre added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2025
Even if #1244 has updated the resolved_reference, it seems it didn't do
a complete update (python-rocksdb version was still marked as 0.9.2
instead of 0.9.3). The lock file was generated with poetry-2.1.1, and
thus includes some new fields.

The only downside of not doing this change seems to be that in
development setups where python-rocksdb v0.9.2 exists in the cache, it
will be used instead of correctly installing the one from github with
version v0.9.3.
jansegre added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
Even if #1244 has updated the resolved_reference, it seems it didn't do
a complete update (python-rocksdb version was still marked as 0.9.2
instead of 0.9.3). The lock file was generated with poetry-2.1.1, and
thus includes some new fields.

The only downside of not doing this change seems to be that in
development setups where python-rocksdb v0.9.2 exists in the cache, it
will be used instead of correctly installing the one from github with
version v0.9.3.
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2025
2 tasks
@jansegre jansegre moved this from Waiting to be deployed to Done in Hathor Network Jul 22, 2025
@jansegre jansegre mentioned this pull request Aug 7, 2025
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants