Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix types build by specifying return type on portal render method #5159

Conversation

beawar
Copy link
Contributor

@beawar beawar commented Oct 15, 2024

Description

Linked issue: #5129

Problem
There is a warning printed by rollup during build of types, which is preventing the generation of the portal.d.ts file.
Specifically, the TS error is the following:
TS2742: The inferred type of render cannot be named without a reference to react-dom/ node_modules/@types/ react. This is likely not portable. A type annotation is necessary.

This warning is actually an error which is preventing the generation of the declaration file for the portal.tsx.

Changes
Added the return type to the render method of the portal class

Screenshots

To reviewers

Contribution checklist

  • I have followed the contributing guidelines.
  • I have added sufficient test coverage for my changes.
  • I have formatted my code with Prettier and checked for linting issues with ESLint for code readability.

This fix solves the warning printed by rollup during build of types,
which is preventing the generation of the portal.d.ts file.

Specifycally, the TS error is the following:
TS2742: The inferred type of render cannot be named without a reference
to react-dom/ node_modules/@types/ react. This is likely not portable.
A type annotation is necessary.

Fixes Hacker0x01#5129
Copy link

@pullrequest pullrequest bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ This pull request was sent to the PullRequest network for review. Expert reviewers are now being matched to your request based on the code's requirements. Stay tuned!

What to expect from this code review:
  • Comments posted to any areas of potential concern or improvement.
  • Detailed feedback or actions needed to resolve issues that are found.
  • Turnaround times vary, but we aim to be swift.

@beawar you can click here to see the review status or cancel the code review job.

Copy link

@pullrequest pullrequest bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PullRequest Breakdown

Reviewable lines of change

+ 1
- 1

100% TSX

Type of change

Fix - These changes are likely to be fixing a bug or issue.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.89%. Comparing base (c7a1c79) to head (1b13e38).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5159   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.89%   96.89%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        3350     3350           
  Branches     1405     1409    +4     
=======================================
  Hits         3246     3246           
+ Misses        104      102    -2     
- Partials        0        2    +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@pullrequest pullrequest bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should effectively address the missing type declaration warning.

Image of Tim L Tim L


Reviewed with ❤️ by PullRequest

@martijnrusschen martijnrusschen merged commit 9204763 into Hacker0x01:main Oct 15, 2024
6 checks passed
@beawar beawar deleted the fix-portal-type-causing-missing-declaration branch October 15, 2024 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants