[SPARK-20792][SS] Support same timeout operations in mapGroupsWithSta… #53
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…te function in batch queries as in streaming queries ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? Currently, in the batch queries, timeout is disabled (i.e. GroupStateTimeout.NoTimeout) which means any GroupState.setTimeout*** operation would throw UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it weird when converting a streaming query into a batch query by changing the input DF from streaming to a batch DF. If the timeout was enabled and used, then the batch query will start throwing UnsupportedOperationException. This PR creates the dummy state in batch queries with the provided timeoutConf so that it behaves in the same way. The code has been refactored to make it obvious when the state is being created for a batch query or a streaming query. ## How was this patch tested? Additional tests Author: Tathagata Das <[email protected]> Closes #18024 from tdas/SPARK-20792.
GulajavaMinistudio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2020
…in optimizations <!-- Thanks for sending a pull request! Here are some tips for you: 1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html 2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html 3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'. 4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes. 5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes. 6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review. --> ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? <!-- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below. 1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers. 2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes. 3. If there is design documentation, please add the link. 4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link. --> This is a followup of apache#26434 This PR use one special shuffle reader for skew join, so that we only have one join after optimization. In order to do that, this PR 1. add a very general `CustomShuffledRowRDD` which support all kind of partition arrangement. 2. move the logic of coalescing shuffle partitions to a util function, and call it during skew join optimization, to totally decouple with the `ReduceNumShufflePartitions` rule. It's too complicated to interfere skew join with `ReduceNumShufflePartitions`, as you need to consider the size of split partitions which don't respect target size already. ### Why are the changes needed? <!-- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, 1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API. 2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug. --> The current skew join optimization has a serious performance issue: the size of the query plan depends on the number and size of skewed partitions. ### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change? <!-- If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible. If no, write 'No'. --> no ### How was this patch tested? <!-- If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible. If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future. If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add. --> existing tests test UI manually:  explain output ``` AdaptiveSparkPlan(isFinalPlan=true) +- OverwriteByExpression org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.noop.NoopTable$403a2ed5, [AlwaysTrue()], org.apache.spark.sql.util.CaseInsensitiveStringMap1f +- *(5) SortMergeJoin(skew=true) [key1#2L], [key2#6L], Inner :- *(3) Sort [key1#2L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0 : +- SkewJoinShuffleReader 2 skewed partitions with size(max=5 KB, min=5 KB, avg=5 KB) : +- ShuffleQueryStage 0 : +- Exchange hashpartitioning(key1#2L, 200), true, [id=#53] : +- *(1) Project [(id#0L % 2) AS key1#2L] : +- *(1) Filter isnotnull((id#0L % 2)) : +- *(1) Range (0, 100000, step=1, splits=6) +- *(4) Sort [key2#6L ASC NULLS FIRST], false, 0 +- SkewJoinShuffleReader 2 skewed partitions with size(max=5 KB, min=5 KB, avg=5 KB) +- ShuffleQueryStage 1 +- Exchange hashpartitioning(key2#6L, 200), true, [id=#64] +- *(2) Project [((id#4L % 2) + 1) AS key2#6L] +- *(2) Filter isnotnull(((id#4L % 2) + 1)) +- *(2) Range (0, 100000, step=1, splits=6) ``` Closes apache#27493 from cloud-fan/aqe. Authored-by: Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: herman <[email protected]>
GulajavaMinistudio
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2025
…ead pool ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This PR aims to use a meaningful class name prefix for REST Submission API thread pool instead of the default value of Jetty QueuedThreadPool, `"qtp"+super.hashCode()`. https://github.com/dekellum/jetty/blob/3dc0120d573816de7d6a83e2d6a97035288bdd4a/jetty-util/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/util/thread/QueuedThreadPool.java#L64 ### Why are the changes needed? This is helpful during JVM investigation. **BEFORE (4.0.0-preview2)** ``` $ SPARK_MASTER_OPTS='-Dspark.master.rest.enabled=true' sbin/start-master.sh $ jstack 28217 | grep qtp "qtp1925630411-52" #52 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.07ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134906c10 nid=0xde03 runnable [0x0000000314592000] "qtp1925630411-53" #53 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac6810 nid=0xc603 runnable [0x000000031479e000] "qtp1925630411-54" #54 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x000000013491ae10 nid=0xdc03 runnable [0x00000003149aa000] "qtp1925630411-55" #55 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.08ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac9810 nid=0xc803 runnable [0x0000000314bb6000] "qtp1925630411-56" #56 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.04ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134ac9e10 nid=0xda03 runnable [0x0000000314dc2000] "qtp1925630411-57" #57 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134aca410 nid=0xca03 runnable [0x0000000314fce000] "qtp1925630411-58" #58 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.04ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134acaa10 nid=0xcb03 runnable [0x00000003151da000] "qtp1925630411-59" #59 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x0000000134acb010 nid=0xcc03 runnable [0x00000003153e6000] "qtp1925630411-60-acceptor-0108e9815-ServerConnector1e497474{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #60 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.11ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x00000001317ffa10 nid=0xcd03 runnable [0x00000003155f2000] "qtp1925630411-61-acceptor-11d90f2aa-ServerConnector1e497474{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #61 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.10ms elapsed=19.06s tid=0x00000001314ed610 nid=0xcf03 waiting on condition [0x00000003157fe000] ``` **AFTER** ``` $ SPARK_MASTER_OPTS='-Dspark.master.rest.enabled=true' sbin/start-master.sh $ jstack 28317 | grep StandaloneRestServer "StandaloneRestServer-52" #52 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.09ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284a8e10 nid=0xdb03 runnable [0x000000032cfce000] "StandaloneRestServer-53" #53 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284acc10 nid=0xda03 runnable [0x000000032d1da000] "StandaloneRestServer-54" #54 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284ae610 nid=0xd803 runnable [0x000000032d3e6000] "StandaloneRestServer-55" #55 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.09ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284aec10 nid=0xd703 runnable [0x000000032d5f2000] "StandaloneRestServer-56" #56 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284af210 nid=0xc803 runnable [0x000000032d7fe000] "StandaloneRestServer-57" #57 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284af810 nid=0xc903 runnable [0x000000032da0a000] "StandaloneRestServer-58" #58 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.06ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284afe10 nid=0xcb03 runnable [0x000000032dc16000] "StandaloneRestServer-59" #59 daemon prio=5 os_prio=31 cpu=0.05ms elapsed=60.06s tid=0x00000001284b0410 nid=0xcc03 runnable [0x000000032de22000] "StandaloneRestServer-60-acceptor-04aefbaa8-ServerConnector44284d85{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #60 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.13ms elapsed=60.05s tid=0x000000015cda1a10 nid=0xcd03 runnable [0x000000032e02e000] "StandaloneRestServer-61-acceptor-148976251-ServerConnector44284d85{HTTP/1.1, (http/1.1)}{M3-Max.local:6066}" #61 daemon prio=3 os_prio=31 cpu=0.12ms elapsed=60.05s tid=0x000000015cd1c810 nid=0xce03 waiting on condition [0x000000032e23a000] ``` ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No, the thread names are accessed during the debugging. ### How was this patch tested? Manual review. ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No. Closes apache#48924 from dongjoon-hyun/SPARK-50385. Authored-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: panbingkun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…te function in batch queries as in streaming queries
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, in the batch queries, timeout is disabled (i.e. GroupStateTimeout.NoTimeout) which means any GroupState.setTimeout*** operation would throw UnsupportedOperationException. This makes it weird when converting a streaming query into a batch query by changing the input DF from streaming to a batch DF. If the timeout was enabled and used, then the batch query will start throwing UnsupportedOperationException.
This PR creates the dummy state in batch queries with the provided timeoutConf so that it behaves in the same way. The code has been refactored to make it obvious when the state is being created for a batch query or a streaming query.
How was this patch tested?
Additional tests
Author: Tathagata Das [email protected]
Closes apache#18024 from tdas/SPARK-20792.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this patch was tested. E.g. unit tests, integration tests, manual tests)
(If this patch involves UI changes, please attach a screenshot; otherwise, remove this)
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.