README.md: update BuildKit/img comparison #642
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Latest BuildKit/img no longer necessarily requires procMount to be unmasked, by not unsharing PID namespaces. The current drawback of BuildKit/img compared to kaniko is that BuildKit/img requires seccomp and AppArmor to be disabled so as to create nested containers. moby/buildkit#768 genuinetools/img#221 Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <[email protected]>
|
@dlorenc @priyawadhwa PTAL? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Latest BuildKit/img no longer necessarily requires procMount to be unmasked, by
not unsharing PID namespaces.
The current drawback of BuildKit/img compared to kaniko is that BuildKit/img
requires seccomp and AppArmor to be disabled so as to create nested containers.
moby/buildkit#768
genuinetools/img#221
Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda [email protected]