Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: async behaviour custom rag qa chain, move custom chain decorator … #1402

Merged

Conversation

eliasecchig
Copy link
Contributor

  • Fix async behaviour custom rag qa chain
  • Move custom chain decorator to pattern
  • Fix evaluation code in getting started

Copy link

🤖 I detect that the PR title and the commit message differ and there's only one commit. To use the PR title for the commit history, you can use Github's automerge feature with squashing, or use automerge label. Good luck human!

-- conventional-commit-lint bot
https://conventionalcommits.org/

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@eliasecchig eliasecchig force-pushed the fix-async-custom-rag branch 4 times, most recently from ce20fe0 to 8963d3b Compare November 13, 2024 23:47
@eliasecchig eliasecchig marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2024 23:49
@eliasecchig eliasecchig requested a review from a team as a code owner November 13, 2024 23:49
@eliasecchig eliasecchig force-pushed the fix-async-custom-rag branch 3 times, most recently from 579c03e to 4de0613 Compare November 14, 2024 14:43
… move custom chain decorator to pattern, fix evaluation code in getting started
@holtskinner holtskinner changed the title Fix async behaviour custom rag qa chain, move custom chain decorator … fix: async behaviour custom rag qa chain, move custom chain decorator … Nov 14, 2024
@holtskinner holtskinner merged commit 1907bb3 into GoogleCloudPlatform:main Nov 14, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants