Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/Adding right function to count estimated value on project single … #4974

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

kkatusic
Copy link
Collaborator

@kkatusic kkatusic commented Jan 23, 2025

…page

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced calculation logic for estimated matching in project action card section
    • Improved data extraction for matching strategy and total estimated matching computations

@kkatusic kkatusic self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 23, 2025 2:16pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the QFSection.tsx component, focusing on changes to the destructuring of the estimatedMatching object. The update introduces two new properties: matching and qfStrategy. These additions expand the component's data access and potentially enhance the calculation of total estimated matching. The changes suggest a more comprehensive approach to handling matching-related data within the project view component.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx - Added matching to estimatedMatching destructuring
- Included qfStrategy in activeStartedRound destructuring
- Updated totalEstimatedMatching function call with new parameters

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • CarlosQ96
  • RamRamez

Poem

🐰 Matching magic, data's new dance,
Properties bloom with each glance,
QF strategy takes its flight,
Calculations now shine so bright,
A rabbit's code, precise and neat! 🧮


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx (1)

Update donation matching calculation for consistency with new QF strategy

The calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount function needs to be updated to handle the new QF strategy (Cocm) consistently with calculateTotalEstimatedMatching. Currently, it's missing the matching and qfStrategy parameters, which could lead to incorrect matching estimates for donations when using the new strategy.

  • src/helpers/qf.ts: Add matching and qfStrategy parameters to calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount and implement the Cocm strategy handling similar to calculateTotalEstimatedMatching.
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 146-166: Verify consistency with donation matching calculations.

The calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount function in the DonationMatch component should be consistent with the new QF strategy. Consider updating it to include the new parameters (matching and qfStrategy) for consistency with calculateTotalEstimatedMatching.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the donation matching calculation implementation
echo "Searching for calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount implementation..."
rg -t typescript "calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount.*=" .

echo "Checking for potential inconsistencies in calculation methods..."
rg -t typescript "calculate.*Matching" .

Length of output: 485


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search with correct file extensions and more context
echo "Searching for calculation implementation..."
rg "calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount.*=" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -B 2 -A 5

echo "\nChecking for related calculation methods..."
rg "calculate.*Matching" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -B 2 -A 5

echo "\nChecking for imports of calculation functions..."
rg "import.*calculate.*Matching" -g "*.{ts,tsx}"

Length of output: 11867


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the implementation of both calculation functions
echo "Examining calculation functions implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const calculateEstimatedMatchingWithDonationAmount = $_' src/helpers/qf.ts

echo "\nExamining total matching calculation implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const calculateTotalEstimatedMatching = $_' src/helpers/qf.ts

Length of output: 3262

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx (1)

61-66: Add optional chaining for the new matching property.

Since matching is a new property being destructured from estimatedMatching, ensure it's handled safely to prevent runtime errors when the property is undefined.

 const {
   projectDonationsSqrtRootSum,
   matchingPool,
   allProjectsSum,
-  matching,
+  matching = {},
 } = estimatedMatching ?? {};
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b9598a and 64b58f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx (2)

74-74: Verify the QF strategy implementation.

The new qfStrategy property suggests a change in the QF calculation strategy. Please ensure:

  1. The property is properly typed in the interface/type definition.
  2. All possible strategy values are handled in the calculation logic.
✅ Verification successful

QF strategy implementation is properly structured and handled

The qfStrategy property is:

  • Correctly typed as QfStrategyEnum in the type definitions
  • Properly handled in calculation logic with null checks and specific handling for different strategies
  • Consistently implemented across all relevant components
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for QF strategy type definitions and implementations
echo "Searching for QF strategy type definitions..."
rg -t typescript "type.*QFStrategy|interface.*QFStrategy" .

echo "Searching for QF strategy implementations..."
rg -t typescript "qfStrategy.*=" .

Length of output: 368


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for QF strategy related code with correct file patterns
echo "Searching for QF strategy type definitions..."
rg "type.*QFStrategy|interface.*QFStrategy|enum.*QFStrategy" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -A 5

echo "\nSearching for QF strategy usages..."
rg "qfStrategy" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -A 2

echo "\nSearching for QF related types and interfaces..."
rg "interface.*QF|type.*QF|enum.*QF" -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -A 5

Length of output: 8103


77-82: Verify the updated calculation function implementation.

The calculateTotalEstimatedMatching function has been updated to accept two new parameters: matching and qfStrategy. Please ensure:

  1. The function implementation in @/helpers/qf properly handles these new parameters.
  2. The calculation logic is tested with different combinations of these parameters.
✅ Verification successful

Implementation verified and working correctly

The function properly handles both new parameters:

  • Returns the matching value directly when qfStrategy is set to 'Cocm'
  • Falls back to quadratic funding calculation for other strategies
  • Maintains backward compatibility with proper default values
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the function implementation and its tests
echo "Searching for calculateTotalEstimatedMatching implementation..."
rg -t typescript "calculateTotalEstimatedMatching.*=" .

echo "Searching for related test files..."
fd -t f "test.*qf" .

Length of output: 333


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the function implementation
echo "Searching for function implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export const calculateTotalEstimatedMatching = $_'

echo "\nSearching for function usage and test files..."
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' "calculateTotalEstimatedMatching" .

echo "\nSearching for test files..."
fd -e test.ts -e test.tsx -e spec.ts -e spec.tsx .

Length of output: 3043

Copy link
Member

@mateodaza mateodaza left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looking good!

@kkatusic kkatusic merged commit dcdc7a5 into develop Jan 24, 2025
3 checks passed
@kkatusic kkatusic deleted the fix/project_estimated_value branch January 24, 2025 08:07
kkatusic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2025
…lue"

This reverts commit dcdc7a5, reversing
changes made to 72d5be7.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants