feat: add ajusts on social profiles validation

[Reshzera]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced the verification process by allowing it to proceed even when the project registry is not available, potentially improving user experience in certain workflows.

• Bug Fixes

  • Adjusted the logic in the verification step to include cases previously excluded, ensuring smoother handling of verification scenarios.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jul 24, 2024 8:54pm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The change in the checkVerificationStep function in src/helpers/projects.ts modifies the logic by removing the condition that checks if verificationData.projectRegistry is not null. This allows verification to proceed even when projectRegistry is null, potentially altering the verification outcomes and the control flow of the application.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
src/helpers/projects.ts	Removed the check for verificationData.projectRegistry being non-null in the checkVerificationStep function, altering the control flow and permitting different outcomes during verification.

Poem

🐰 In a world where checks once stood tall,
A change was made, embracing all.
No more limits, let the flow be free,
As rabbits hop with glee and esprit!
A step towards freedom, bold and bright,
In the land of verification, all feels right! 🌼✨

---

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6688931 and 60764f3.

Files selected for processing (1)

• src/helpers/projects.ts (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (3)

src/helpers/projects.ts (3)

Line range hint 86-102:
Verify correctness due to dependency on checkVerificationStep.

The findFirstIncompleteStep function relies on the checkVerificationStep function, which has been modified. Ensure that the changes in checkVerificationStep do not introduce any unintended behavior in this function.

---

Line range hint 42-45:
Potential issue: Verification proceeds even if projectRegistry is null.

The removal of the condition checking if verificationData.projectRegistry is null allows the verification to proceed even if projectRegistry is null. This might lead to unexpected behavior and should be carefully considered. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended verification logic.

---

Line range hint 62-74:
Verify correctness due to dependency on checkVerificationStep.

The checkAllVerificationsSteps function relies on the checkVerificationStep function, which has been modified. Ensure that the changes in checkVerificationStep do not introduce any unintended behavior in this function.

Verification successful

---

Verification successful: No issues found.

The checkVerificationStep function changes align with the intended verification flow and do not introduce any unintended behavior in checkAllVerificationsSteps.

• DesktopMenu.tsx and TermsAndConditions.tsx correctly use checkAllVerificationsSteps to ensure all verification steps are completed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `checkAllVerificationsSteps` and ensure the logic aligns with the intended verification flow.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances where the logic aligns with the intended verification flow.
rg --type typescript -A 5 $'checkAllVerificationsSteps'

Length of output: 89

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `checkAllVerificationsSteps` and ensure the logic aligns with the intended verification flow.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences where the logic aligns with the intended verification flow.
rg -A 5 'checkAllVerificationsSteps'

Length of output: 2457

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract relevant code around the `checkAllVerificationsSteps` calls in `DesktopMenu.tsx` and `TermsAndConditions.tsx` to analyze the context and logic.

# Extract code around the call in DesktopMenu.tsx
rg -A 10 -B 10 'checkAllVerificationsSteps' src/components/views/verification/menu/DesktopMenu.tsx

# Extract code around the call in TermsAndConditions.tsx
rg -A 10 -B 10 'checkAllVerificationsSteps' src/components/views/verification/TermsAndConditions.tsx

Length of output: 2796

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract the implementation of the `checkVerificationStep` function to verify its correctness.

# Extract the implementation of `checkVerificationStep` function in `projects.ts`
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function checkVerificationStep($_, $_) { $$$ }'

Length of output: 2808

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[Reshzera]

Giveth/impact-graph#576

[kkatusic]

Thx @Reshzera