Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SAWCore terms are not printed in the current number base #93

Closed
brianhuffman opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed

SAWCore terms are not printed in the current number base #93

brianhuffman opened this issue Jan 14, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
easy Issues that are expected to be easy to resolve and might therefore be good for new contributors

Comments

@brianhuffman
Copy link
Contributor

Issue #29 (now closed) covered the use of set_base for printing results of evaluation and SAT counterexamples in the desired number base. set_base should also determine the number base to use for print_term and for printing Theorems.
@atomb atomb added the easy Issues that are expected to be easy to resolve and might therefore be good for new contributors label Feb 3, 2016
brianhuffman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2021
Merge pull request #93 from GaloisInc/intmod
7b04d2e 
Improved support for IntMod type in symbolic backends
brianhuffman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2021
Fix implementation of fromIntMod in concrete evaluation backend.
2d04786 
It had been broken since #93 introduced a separate value constructor
for the `IntMod` type.

(#936)
brianhuffman pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2021
Fix incorrect implementation of intModUnOp in sbv backend.
56f6585 
This was an unintentional omission from PR #93, which correctly
updated `intModUnOp` in the what4 backend, but not in sbv.

Fixes #114.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
easy Issues that are expected to be easy to resolve and might therefore be good for new contributors
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@atomb @brianhuffman