Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add compositional verification for x86 #554

Closed
atomb opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Add compositional verification for x86 #554

atomb opened this issue Oct 1, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
subsystem: x86 Issues related to verifying x86 binaries via Macaw type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability
Milestone
Someday

Comments

@atomb
Copy link
Contributor

atomb commented Oct 1, 2019

At the moment, x86 verification is possible but requires writing proof scripts in Haskell code. Exposing that infrastructure in a way similar to crucible_llvm_verify would significantly reduce the effort of doing x86 verification. Having #553 done first would be very valuable.
@atomb atomb added the type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability label Oct 1, 2019
@atomb atomb added this to the 1.0 milestone Oct 1, 2019
@atomb atomb removed this from the 0.5 milestone Jan 17, 2020
@brianhuffman
Copy link
Contributor

Verification for x86 has been implemented by a series of PRs (#630, #651, #710, #712, #725, #753, #802, #847, #859). Are those sufficient to close this ticket?

@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott added the subsystem: x86 Issues related to verifying x86 binaries via Macaw label Dec 6, 2021
@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g added this to the Someday milestone Oct 29, 2024
@RyanGlScott
Copy link
Contributor

Are those sufficient to close this ticket?

Yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
subsystem: x86 Issues related to verifying x86 binaries via Macaw type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Someday
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@atomb @brianhuffman @RyanGlScott @sauclovian-g