Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use prebuilt solver binaries from what4-solvers #1284

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 17, 2021
Merged

Conversation

atomb
Copy link
Contributor

@atomb atomb commented Sep 14, 2021

No description provided.

@atomb atomb added this to the 2.12.0 milestone Sep 14, 2021
Copy link
Member

@kquick kquick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

Aaron Tomb added 6 commits September 15, 2021 16:07
We're using GHC 8.6.5 for tests
They’re stalling for unknown reasons, and aren’t as critical as the
others. Running the  Linux tests is the most critical.
@atomb atomb merged commit 30af0ba into master Sep 17, 2021
@atomb atomb deleted the at-prebuilt-solvers branch September 17, 2021 22:47
case "$RUNNER_OS" in
Linux) ldd $1 || true ;;
macOS) otool -L $1 || true ;;
Windows) ldd $1 || true ;;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the intent of the || true for these? It will always allow these to succeed, so is this just for getting logging output to show which binary is running and the validity of the available shared libs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@atomb atomb Sep 20, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

At least ldd (and maybe otool?) return non-zero for statically-linked executables, and some of the executables we generate are expected to be statically linked. And, ultimately, yeah, the purpose of this is to have extra log output to help with debugging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants