Teach the typechecker a bit more about exponents #1149
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes issue #734, and partially addresses #930. The basic issue with 734 was that the solver was chosing spurious counterexamples for the exponent function; in particular, models where the output was not at least 1. The fairly restricted axiom we add here just says that the exponent function is at least as large as its base for positive inputs.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes issue #734, and partially addresses #930.
The basic issue with 734 was that the solver was chosing
spurious counterexamples for the exponent function; in particular,
models where the output was not at least 1. The fairly restricted
axiom we add here just says that the exponent function is at least
as large as its base for positive inputs.