44-route authentication #48
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more). 🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/bitsofgood/npp/ebr7lt6yj |
Navbryce
commented
Oct 26, 2020
| @@ -89,5 +89,8 @@ | |||
| "lint-staged": "^10.4.0", | |||
| "prettier": "^2.0.5", | |||
| "typescript": "^3.9.3" | |||
| }, | |||
| "peerOptionalDependencies": { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Josh-McFarlin
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Lays out the foundation for route authentication. The other change we need to focus on is deciding what "updates" user's can perform. Obviously, for updating something like an Application document, we only want users to be able to update select features.
Part: 1 of #44
Tested locally