-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add automated tests #710
add automated tests #710
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @Naseem77, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request adds tests for the search functionality in the Settings Config and Settings Users pages. It includes modifications to the TableComponent to add an ID for the search functionality, updates to the POM files to include locators and methods for interacting with the search elements, and new tests to validate the search functionality.
Highlights
- Table Component Modification: The TableComponent was modified to include an ID for the search div, which will be used for locating the search functionality in the tests.
- POM Updates: The SettingsConfigPage and SettingsUsersPage POM files were updated to include locators for the search button, search input, and table rows. New methods were added to interact with these elements, such as
searchForElement
andgetTableRolesCount
. - New Tests: New tests were added to
settingsConfig.spec.ts
andsettingsUsers.spec.ts
to validate the search functionality. These tests verify that the search input filters the table results as expected.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- app/components/TableComponent.tsx
- Added an ID to the search div.
- e2e/config/settingsConfigData.json
- Added searchElements array with input and expected values for search tests.
- e2e/logic/POM/settingsConfigPage.ts
- Added locators for search button, search input, and table rows.
- Added methods
searchForElement
andgetTableRolesCount
.
- e2e/logic/POM/settingsUsersPage.ts
- Added locators for search button, search input, and table rows.
- Added methods
searchForElement
andgetTableRolesCount
.
- e2e/tests/settingsConfig.spec.ts
- Added tests to validate role filtering via search input.
- e2e/tests/settingsUsers.spec.ts
- Added tests to validate user search filters table results.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
The tests they run, the tests they pass,
Validating search, a crucial task.
With locators found and methods set,
The config's filtered, no room for regret.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request introduces new tests for the settings configuration and users pages, enhancing the test coverage for search functionality. The changes include adding search elements to the settings configuration data and implementing search functionality in the page object models (POMs) for both settings configuration and users pages. Overall, the changes seem well-structured and improve the testability of the application.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces valuable tests and functionality. Since there are no review comments, the code appears to be in good shape to be merged. However, I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and it should be reviewed and approved by others before merging.
No description provided.