-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #700 replace all sheets components in drawer components #709
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @Anchel123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request addresses issue #700 by replacing all instances of the Sheet
component with the Drawer
component in the application. This change affects the Header.tsx
and AddUser.tsx
files, where Sheet
components were previously used for displaying content in a modal-like manner. Additionally, the FormComponent.tsx
file was modified to include a className
prop, allowing for more flexible styling of the form component. The Drawer
component was also updated to allow the specification of the side from which the drawer appears.
Highlights
- Component Replacement: Replaced
Sheet
components withDrawer
components inHeader.tsx
andAddUser.tsx
. - FormComponent Enhancement: Added a
className
prop to theFormComponent
to allow for custom styling. - Drawer Component Update: The
DrawerContent
component now accepts aside
prop to control the drawer's appearance direction.
Changelog
Click here to see the changelog
- app/components/FormComponent.tsx
- Added
className
prop to theFormComponent
interface. - Applied the
className
prop to the form element. - Set a default value for the
className
prop.
- Added
- app/components/Header.tsx
- Replaced
Sheet
component withDrawer
component. - Updated imports to reflect the component change from
Sheet
toDrawer
. - Modified the structure of the 'About' section to use
DrawerTrigger
andDrawerContent
.
- Replaced
- app/settings/users/AddUser.tsx
- Replaced
Sheet
component withDrawer
component. - Updated imports to reflect the component change from
Sheet
toDrawer
. - Modified the structure of the
AddUser
component to useDrawerTrigger
andDrawerContent
. - Added
className
to FormComponent
- Replaced
- components/ui/drawer.tsx
- Added
side
prop to theDrawerContent
component to control the drawer's appearance direction. - Modified the styling of the
DrawerContent
based on theside
prop. - Added styling to the drag handle based on the
side
prop.
- Added
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
The term 'UI' stands for User Interface, which refers to the means by which a user interacts with a computer or device.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request replaces the Sheet components with Drawer components in several files. This change aims to improve the user interface and experience. The changes seem well-structured and consistent across the files.
Merge Readiness
The code changes appear to be well-implemented and consistent. I recommend that the pull request be merged after addressing the feedback provided. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.
No description provided.