Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #683 Optimize table search filtering with debounced state and memoized fil… #692

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

Anchel123
Copy link
Contributor

…ter function

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
falkordb-browser ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 2, 2025 3:14pm

@Anchel123 Anchel123 linked an issue Mar 2, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @Anchel123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses issue #683 by optimizing the table search filtering within the TableComponent. The primary changes involve debouncing the state updates related to the search input and memoizing the filter function to prevent unnecessary re-renders and improve performance. The filtering logic is now performed with a 500ms delay after the user stops typing, and the filter function is only re-created when the search term changes.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization: Implements debounced state for the search input to reduce the frequency of filtering operations.
  • Memoization: Uses useCallback to memoize the handleSearchFilter function, preventing unnecessary re-renders of the table rows.
  • Filtered Rows State: Introduces a filteredRows state to hold the filtered rows, updating it based on the debounced search input.

Changelog

  • app/components/TableComponent.tsx
    • Imported useCallback and useEffect from 'react'. (line 13)
    • Added filteredRows state to store the filtered rows. (line 49)
    • Implemented handleSearchFilter using useCallback to memoize the filter function based on the search term. (line 51)
    • Introduced a useEffect hook to debounce the filtering logic, updating filteredRows 500ms after the search term changes. (line 70)
    • Moved the handleSetEditable function below the useEffect hook. (line 82)
    • Updated the table body to render filteredRows instead of directly filtering the rows array. (line 148)
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Trivia time!

What is the primary use case for the useCallback hook in React?

Click here for the answer
The primary use case for the useCallback hook in React is to memoize a function instance so that it can be passed as a prop to child components without causing unnecessary re-renders.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request addresses issue #683 by optimizing the table search filtering using debounced state and a memoized filter function. This approach aims to improve performance by reducing the number of filter operations performed during search. The changes include the introduction of useCallback for the handleSearchFilter function, a useEffect hook for debouncing the filter operation, and the use of a filteredRows state variable to store the filtered rows. Overall, the changes seem well-structured and should contribute to a smoother user experience.

Merge Readiness

The changes implemented in this pull request appear to be well-structured and address the performance issue effectively. The use of useCallback and useEffect with debouncing is a good approach to optimize the search filtering. The code is generally clear and easy to follow. Given the nature of the changes and the potential performance improvements, this pull request seems ready to be merged. However, as I am unable to directly approve the pull request, I recommend that other reviewers also examine the code and provide their approval before merging. Ensure that all tests pass and that the changes do not introduce any regressions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 2, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Anchel123 Anchel123 merged commit fb38a13 into staging Mar 5, 2025
7 checks passed
@Anchel123 Anchel123 deleted the give-delay-when-search-in-table branch March 5, 2025 09:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Search box should have some delay on search
2 participants