fix #51 fix READMe example #81
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #81 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 72.61% 72.61%
Complexity 220 220
=========================================
Files 25 25
Lines 712 712
Branches 64 64
=========================================
Hits 517 517
Misses 159 159
Partials 36 36 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)
24-24: LGTM: Version update in Official Releases sectionThe version update from 0.2.9 to 0.4.0 reflects the latest stable release, which is great for users to know.
Consider adding a comment above the XML snippet to indicate that this is the latest stable version, e.g., "". This would make it even clearer for users.
47-47: LGTM: Version update in Snapshots sectionThe version update from 0.3.0-SNAPSHOT to 0.4.1-SNAPSHOT correctly reflects the latest development version.
Consider adding a comment above the XML snippet to indicate that this is the latest development version, e.g., "". This would provide more context for users who might be interested in testing new features.
Line range hint
69-102: LGTM: Improved code example with better readabilityThe changes in the main code example, including the use of a for-each loop and more descriptive variable names, improve readability and follow Java best practices.
Consider adding a brief comment before the result set iteration to explain what the code is doing, e.g., "// Iterate over the result set and print node and edge information". This would provide more context for readers.
112-118: LGTM: New GraphContext and transaction example addedThe addition of the GraphContext and transaction example is excellent. It demonstrates advanced features and good practices like using try-with-resources for context management.
Consider adding a brief comment before this new example to explain its purpose, e.g., "// Example of using GraphContext and transactions". This would help readers understand the significance of this new code segment.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)
3-3: LGTM: Maven Central badge updateThe updated Maven Central badge now directly shows the version, which is more informative for users. This change aligns well with the PR objective to fix the README.
61-65: LGTM: New import statements addedThe addition of import statements for GraphContext, GraphContextGenerator, GraphTransaction, Record, and ResultSet is appropriate. These imports support the new functionality demonstrated in the updated code example.
Line range hint
1-141: Overall LGTM: README updates improve documentation and examplesThe changes to the README.md file effectively address the PR objective. The updates to version numbers, badge links, and code examples provide users with current and accurate information about the JFalkorDB Java client. The addition of new examples, particularly the GraphContext and transaction example, demonstrates more advanced features of the library, which is valuable for users.
These changes collectively improve the quality and usefulness of the documentation.
Summary by CodeRabbit