Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bgpd: fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers #16977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

louis-6wind
Copy link
Contributor

Fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers. For example:

Sep 26 17:56:44 r1 bgpd[26295]: [GJPH1-W8PZV] Resetting peer (null)(Unknown) due to change in addpath config

Is now:

Oct 02 14:00:59 r1 bgpd[12795]: [MNE5N-K0G4Z] Resetting peer 2.2.2.2 due to change in addpath config

Fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers. For example:

> Sep 26 17:56:44 r1 bgpd[26295]: [GJPH1-W8PZV] Resetting peer (null)(Unknown) due to change in addpath config

Is now:

> Oct 02 14:00:59 r1 bgpd[12795]: [MNE5N-K0G4Z] Resetting peer 2.2.2.2 due to change in addpath config

Signed-off-by: Louis Scalbert <[email protected]>
@ton31337 ton31337 added this to the 10.2 milestone Oct 2, 2024
@ton31337
Copy link
Member

ton31337 commented Oct 2, 2024

@Mergifyio backport stable/10.1 stable/10.0 stable/9.1 stable/9.0

Copy link

mergify bot commented Oct 2, 2024

backport stable/10.1 stable/10.0 stable/9.1 stable/9.0

✅ Backports have been created

@ton31337 ton31337 merged commit 56d6a1a into FRRouting:master Oct 2, 2024
16 checks passed
ton31337 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
bgpd: fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers (backport #16977)
ton31337 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
bgpd: fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers (backport #16977)
ton31337 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2024
bgpd: fix printfrr_bp for non initialized peers (backport #16977)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants