Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bgpd: fix mishandled attribute length [3.0] #1418

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2017

Conversation

qlyoung
Copy link
Member

@qlyoung qlyoung commented Nov 6, 2017

A crafted BGP UPDATE with a malformed path attribute length field causes
bgpd to dump up to 65535 bytes of application memory and send it as the
data field in a BGP NOTIFY message, which is truncated to 4075 bytes
after accounting for protocol headers. After reading a malformed length
field, a NOTIFY is generated that is supposed to contain the problematic
data, but the malformed length field is inadvertently used to compute
how much data we send.

CVE-2017-15865

Ticket:
CM-18492

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young [email protected]

@qlyoung qlyoung changed the title bgpd: fix mishandled attribute length bgpd: fix mishandled attribute length [3.0] Nov 6, 2017
A crafted BGP UPDATE with a malformed path attribute length field causes
bgpd to dump up to 65535 bytes of application memory and send it as the
data field in a BGP NOTIFY message, which is truncated to 4075 bytes
after accounting for protocol headers. After reading a malformed length
field, a NOTIFY is generated that is supposed to contain the problematic
data, but the malformed length field is inadvertently used to compute
how much data we send.

CVE-2017-15865

Signed-off-by: Quentin Young <[email protected]>
@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2003/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1418, comparing to Git base SHA b13553e

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

138 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2003/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2004/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1418, comparing to Git base SHA b13553e

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

138 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2004/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2005/

This is a comment from an EXPERIMENTAL automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.


CLANG Static Analyzer Summary

  • Github Pull Request 1418, comparing to Git base SHA eaee01c

No Changes in Static Analysis warnings compared to base

138 Static Analyzer issues remaining.

See details at
https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-2005/artifact/shared/static_analysis/index.html

@riw777 riw777 merged commit d4c5831 into FRRouting:stable/3.0 Nov 7, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants