Skip to content

Migrate deprecated pronouns #39522

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Migrate deprecated pronouns #39522

merged 12 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor

@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 commented Apr 3, 2024

Details

Deprecated pronouns are still being stored in the database. This PR migrates those by calling UpdatePronouns API with the new pronouns format.

Deprecated English Spanish
He/him He / Him / His Él
She/her She / Her / Hers Ella
They/them They / Them / Theirs Ellos
Ze/hir Ze / Hir Ze / Hir
Call me by my name Call me by my name Llámame por mi nombre
Self-select Select your pronouns Selecciona tus pronombres

Fixed Issues

$ #38969
PROPOSAL: #38969 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open DevTools and manually change your pronouns to a deprecated value in Onyx
Onyx.merge('personalDetailsList', { your_account_id: { pronouns: 'He/him' } })
  1. Refresh the page
  2. Go to Profile Settings page
  3. Verify Pronouns shows the corresponding new pronouns (He / Him / His in this case)
  4. Verify UpdatePronouns API is triggered to set the correct pronouns
  5. Repeat all steps above with other deprecated values and any custom values
  6. Change language
  7. Verify pronouns is changed accordingly
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

NA

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-04-04.at.02.07.28-source.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-04.at.02.00.36-source.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Untitled.mov
custom.mov

@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2024 18:48
@gijoe0295 gijoe0295 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2024 18:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 3, 2024 18:48
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 3, 2024

@ntdiary Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from ntdiary April 3, 2024 18:48
@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

gijoe0295 commented Apr 3, 2024

@ntdiary Some notes before reviewing:

  1. Deprecated values will show as is in other places such as profile page (not profile settings page), details page... It will only be updated when user opens profile settings page. If user had deprecated pronouns, it would get updated on open App.
  2. There was a Self-selected option which allowed user to use their own custom pronouns. As we don't have its alternative in the new pronouns list and don't allow custom pronouns no more, I think we should treat it as empty pronouns (i.e. they haven't selected a pronouns).

const pronounsKey = currentUserPersonalDetails?.pronouns?.replace(CONST.PRONOUNS.PREFIX, '') ?? '';
const pronounsKey = PersonalDetailsUtils.getPronounsKey(currentUserPersonalDetails);
if (PersonalDetailsUtils.isDeprecatedPronouns(currentUserPersonalDetails)) {
PersonalDetails.updatePronouns(pronounsKey ? `${CONST.PRONOUNS.PREFIX}${pronounsKey}` : '', false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like going with solution 2, and I would like to recommend to use an Onyx migration instead of using the profile page to correct the pronouns.

I guess what you mean by "onyx migration" here is:
create a file like PronounsMigration.ts in the src/libs/migrations directory to handle mapping or even calling the updatePronouns API, instead of calling the API only when the user visits the ProfilePage? 🤔

cc @tgolen

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yes. Thanks. I didn't understand that requirement previously.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that's what I meant. Sorry for not being clear! The migration would still make the API request to fix the pronoun on the server.

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ntdiary Updated with the Onyx migration approach.

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Onyx.connect({
callback: (val) => (privatePersonalDetails = val),
});

function updatePronouns(pronouns: string) {
function updatePronouns(pronouns: string, navigate = true) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd much rather have the navigation happen outside of this method. Is that possible without too much work? I don't like it when the action files do the redirecting because it makes them much more difficult to reuse like you are having to deal with here. It should be handled in the calling code.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes agree! I moved the navigation out.

}

const pronouns = currentUserPersonalDetails.pronouns?.replace(CONST.PRONOUNS.PREFIX, '') ?? '';
const isDeprecatedPronouns = !!pronouns && !pronouns.startsWith(CONST.PRONOUNS.PREFIX);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't quite get why a pronoun starting with __predefined_ would mean it's deprecated. Can you explain why that is the case in a code comment, please?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes this condition is not 100% correct. I changed it to check whether the pronouns is in the latest PRONOUNS_LIST.

Comment on lines 49 to 50
const pronounsKey = Object.entries(CONST.DEPRECATED_PRONOUNS_LIST).find((deprecated) => deprecated[1] === pronouns)?.[0] ?? '';
PersonalDetails.updatePronouns(pronounsKey ? `${CONST.PRONOUNS.PREFIX}${pronounsKey}` : '', false);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm kind of confused about what this code is doing. Can you explain it with a code comment, or change the code to be a little more explanatory?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love it. Those changes are great. Thank you!

@ntdiary
Copy link
Contributor

ntdiary commented Apr 5, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
39522-android-native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
39522-android-chrome.mp4
iOS: Native N/A
iOS: mWeb Safari
39522-ios-safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
39522-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
39522-desktop.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@ntdiary ntdiary left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: this migration only occurs when we launch the app that has logged with an account. If we launch the app first and then login, the migration won't occur. :)

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen April 5, 2024 12:10
@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm I'm not sure why perf-test is failing here but working fine locally.

@ntdiary
Copy link
Contributor

ntdiary commented Apr 5, 2024

Hmm I'm not sure why perf-test is failing here but working fine locally.

I don't think the perf-tests failure is caused by this PR. It seems that the perf-tests is still not very stable.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Apr 10, 2024

I've tried re-running the performance tests, and it's still failing. It looks like the tests completed:

Test Suites: 16 passed, 16 total

but the process fails a little later on because of:

Auto-merging tests/unit/NetworkTest.ts
Auto-merging tests/unit/OptionsListUtilsTest.ts
Auto-merging tests/utils/LHNTestUtils.tsx
Auto-merging wdyr.ts
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.

@gijoe0295 Could you please double-check that you've updated from main and there are no conflicts in these files? It looks like the last time this was updated with main was from 5 days ago, so maybe something snuck in.

@gijoe0295
Copy link
Contributor Author

gijoe0295 commented Apr 10, 2024

@tgolen Thanks for reminding me. I've merged main and all checks passed. Can you try again?

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Apr 10, 2024

Looks like that worked! Thanks

@tgolen tgolen merged commit 458de57 into Expensify:main Apr 10, 2024
14 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.62-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.62-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.62-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.62-17 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ function PronounsPage({currentUserPersonalDetails, isLoadingApp = true}: Pronoun

const updatePronouns = (selectedPronouns: PronounEntry) => {
PersonalDetails.updatePronouns(selectedPronouns.keyForList === currentPronounsKey ? '' : selectedPronouns?.value ?? '');
Navigation.goBack();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This caused

We should introduce a ref called isOptionSelected that will be true when we select an option, which will prevent the option from being selected multiple times.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants