Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HIGH: (Comment linking: step 2) [23220] WEB maintain visible content position #32098

Conversation

perunt
Copy link
Contributor

@perunt perunt commented Nov 28, 2023

Details

This PR introduces the maintainVisibleContentPosition property to React Native for Web (RNW), aligning it with the recent updates in React Native (RN). The implementation is based on the changes from the following upstream PRs:

RN upstream: facebook/react-native#35993
RNW upstream: necolas/react-native-web#2588

The initial implementation for this feature (Expensify/App#28793) was reverted (Expensify/App#31158) due to a bug (Expensify/App#31143). This PR addresses and resolves that issue.

🎉 Thanks to @janicduplessis, it was found and fixed 🎉

Fixed Issues

$ #23220
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. As an employee, create an IOU with a receipt.
  2. Log in as the workspace admin.
  3. Navigate to the workspace chat with the employee.
  4. Access the request conversation and resolve any errors as the admin.

Testing Goals:
Verify the correctness of the scrolling direction in the chat list.
Ensure the copying process functions as expected.
Confirm that styles are properly applied (with nothing appearing inverted).

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@perunt perunt marked this pull request as ready for review November 28, 2023 18:17
@perunt perunt requested a review from a team as a code owner November 28, 2023 18:17
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from 0xmiros and removed request for a team November 28, 2023 18:17
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 28, 2023

@0xmiroslav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@cedarbaum
Copy link

Hey all,

I've been following this PR as well as necolas/react-native-web#2588, since I would also like to get maintainVisibleContentPosition working in RNW.

I've got it mostly working, but wanted to point out one thing I noticed in the usage of the MutationObserver. If the subtree of the FlatList has attributes that change frequently, the observe method will get called each time. I specifically saw this happening when some items in my list had repeating animations via React Native Reanimated, which caused nonstop calls to the observer.

I fixed this for my use case by removing observation of attribute changes altogether:

mutationObserver.observe(contentView, {
  childList: true,
  subtree: true,
});

This works for me, since I am only interested in layout changes due to items being prepended to the list. I am not confident that removing this for all cases is safe, but perhaps at least making it configurable or allowing more granular control over which specific attribute changes to look for could avoid these cases.

@janicduplessis FYI, since this could be relevant to the upstream PR.

Happy to provide more details if needed. Also, wanted to say thanks for the work on this issue and for making it open source!

@janicduplessis
Copy link
Contributor

I did think about that, but thought it wouldn’t handle cases where items are resized. You do bring up a good point though. Thinking about it more I wonder if it would be possible to use ResizeObserver on the content view instead since we only want to maintain position when the content view size changes.

@cedarbaum
Copy link

cedarbaum commented Nov 30, 2023

I did think about that, but thought it wouldn’t handle cases where items are resized. You do bring up a good point though. Thinking about it more I wonder if it would be possible to use ResizeObserver on the content view instead since we only want to maintain position when the content view size changes.

I think ResizeObserver could solve the issue I mentioned, though I did find another interesting case. When the content view changes height due to reasons besides items being added to the list (e.g., a cell is expanded), this can also trigger the scroll offset behavior. In such cases, it is more desirable IMO to maintain the scroll offset, since otherwise the expanded cell can shift upwards and be clipped from the top. So my new solution is to only observe the childList change. Using ResizeObserver would solve the original issue I mentioned but would not avoid this case.

However, I am not sure how maintainVisibleContentPosition handles such cases on other platforms. I think ideally this would be configurable in RN (i.e. allow users to specify whether they only want maintainVisibleContentPosition behavior due to item count changes or always).

Sorry if this is a bit off-topic from this PR, but wanted to mention it in case it is relevant.

@roryabraham roryabraham self-requested a review December 5, 2023 16:18
@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 7, 2023

Confirmed this doesn't cause such issues like #31143, #30947

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 7, 2023

Mostly looks good.
One thing I noticed the behavior different from main:
there's scroll animation down to latest message on reload website

this branch:

Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.4.32.03.pm.mov

main:

Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.4.32.46.pm.mov

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not particularly concerned about that behavior judging by the videos. What happens if there's more than one page of messages in the chat?

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 7, 2023

I'm not particularly concerned about that behavior judging by the videos. What happens if there's more than one page of messages in the chat?

Screen.Recording.2023-12-07.at.6.46.24.pm.mov

But the issue is not consistent. Sometimes show last message immediately

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, looks like we need to fix that

@quinthar quinthar changed the title [23220] WEB maintain visible content position MEDIUM: (Comment linking: step 2) [23220] WEB maintain visible content position Dec 8, 2023
@quinthar quinthar changed the title MEDIUM: (Comment linking: step 2) [23220] WEB maintain visible content position HIGH: (Comment linking: step 2) [23220] WEB maintain visible content position Dec 8, 2023
@perunt
Copy link
Contributor Author

perunt commented Jan 5, 2024

done
lint is green

@perunt
Copy link
Contributor Author

perunt commented Jan 8, 2024

@0xmiroslav, is it good for you? Can we get it merged?

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

roryabraham commented Jan 9, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
android.mov
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

roryabraham commented Jan 9, 2024

Note that I was able to reproduce the weird scrolling issue, but only on Android Chrome, which on a dev environment in an emulator was super janky anyways. So I'm not too concerned by that and sort of doubt we'll see it in production. It's not a huge deal even if we do.

@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
/* eslint-disable es/no-optional-chaining, es/no-nullish-coalescing-operators, react/prop-types */
Copy link
Contributor

@roryabraham roryabraham Jan 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note for posterity: these were disabled to keep this code as similar as possible to the upstream PR it's based on: necolas/react-native-web#2588

Hopefully this component only lives in our codebase relatively temporarily. We probably will want to switch to FlashList soon too for the main chat list.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

Merging through failing reassure per this comment

@roryabraham roryabraham merged commit 4e25271 into Expensify:main Jan 9, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Jan 9, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 9, 2024

@roryabraham looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 9, 2024

Thanks for finalizing review. I will watch out any regressions QA team is reporting. Hope that would not happen again 🙏

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 9, 2024

chat is not scrolled down automatically to see last report action after request money in workspace chat.
Need to confirm if this is caused by this PR

@janicduplessis
Copy link
Contributor

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.4.24-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 10, 2024

chat is not scrolled down automatically to see last report action after request money in workspace chat. Need to confirm if this is caused by this PR

Now this is deploy blocker (not happening on production but staging)

@perunt can you please check?
cc: @roryabraham

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 10, 2024

That also happens when send any attachment

Screenshot 2024-01-10 at 1 48 07 pm
Screen.Recording.2024-01-10.at.1.46.07.pm.mov

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

chat is not scrolled down automatically to see last report action after request money in workspace chat. Need to confirm if this is caused by this PR

useEffect(() => {
        if (previousLastIndex.current !== lastActionIndex && reportActionSize.current > sortedVisibleReportActions.length) {
            reportScrollManager.scrollToBottom();
        }
        previousLastIndex.current = lastActionIndex;
        reportActionSize.current = sortedVisibleReportActions.length;
    }, [lastActionIndex, sortedVisibleReportActions.length, reportScrollManager]);

Maybe update this logic to fix this issue.

@perunt
Copy link
Contributor Author

perunt commented Jan 10, 2024

Going to check this out. Might fix it by going back to https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/32098/files#diff-b1c8c4fd8072edbd35c63a7cdd71b63ff1701a6f43529ea794f7720a86460df2L18, like @janicduplessis said. But, this could mess up comment linking in the next PR. Still, it's a decent quick fix for staging.

@perunt
Copy link
Contributor Author

perunt commented Jan 10, 2024

Can confirm that bringing it back is fixing that issue
#34244
@0xmiroslav

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.24-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

scrollToOffset(0, true);
}
}
}, [getScrollOffset, scrollToOffset, mvcpMinIndexForVisible, mvcpAutoscrollToTopThreshold, horizontal]);
Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt Jul 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Having mvcpAutoscrollToTopThreshold as a dependency made this function gets re-evaluated on value change. Which also made the setupMutationObserver function re-evaluated and executed (due to useEffect). That later function will disconnect the old observer and create a new one. This constant observer recreation is found to disrupt the new message detection.

(Coming from #43600)


mutationObserverRef.current?.disconnect();

const mutationObserver = new MutationObserver(() => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When list is hidden and reappears, it scrolls down to the bottom. But it should keep its last scroll offset. That is why ignore this callback when list is hidden. Coming from #45434

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Status: CRITICAL
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants