Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade express from 4.17.1 to 4.21.2 #173

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Exnadella
Copy link
Owner

@Exnadella Exnadella commented Dec 11, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/polyserve/package.json
  • packages/polyserve/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-8482416
  738  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)


PR Type

enhancement, dependencies


Description

  • Upgraded the express dependency in package.json from version 4.8.5 to 4.21.2 to address a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability.
  • Updated package-lock.json to reflect the changes in express version.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
package.json
Upgrade express dependency to address vulnerabilities       

packages/polyserve/package.json

  • Upgraded express dependency from version 4.8.5 to 4.21.2.
+1/-1     
package-lock.json
Update package-lock.json for express upgrade                         

packages/polyserve/package-lock.json

  • Updated lock file to reflect the upgraded express dependency.
+5640/-5429
Additional files (token-limit)
package-lock.json
...                                                                                                           

packages/polyserve/package-lock.json

...

+5640/-5429

💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

…k.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-8482416
Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Dependency Compatibility
Validate that the major version upgrade of express from 4.8.5 to 4.21.2 maintains compatibility with the rest of the codebase and dependent packages

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
Security
Lock down express version to avoid unintended breaking changes from major version upgrades

While upgrading express to 4.21.2 fixes security vulnerabilities, this is a major
version jump from 4.8.5 that likely includes breaking changes. Review the express
changelog and test thoroughly to ensure compatibility.

packages/polyserve/package.json [50]

-"express": "^4.21.2",
+"express": "~4.21.2",
  • Apply this suggestion
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

Why: Using ~ instead of ^ for version pinning is important for a major version upgrade from 4.8.5 to 4.21.2, as it prevents potential breaking changes from future patch updates while still allowing security fixes.

8

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants