Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade express from 4.17.1 to 4.20.0 #158

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Exnadella
Copy link
Owner

@Exnadella Exnadella commented Sep 18, 2024

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/web-component-tester/package.json
  • packages/web-component-tester/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
  738  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)


PR Type

enhancement, bug fix


Description

  • Upgraded the express package from version 4.15.3 to 4.20.0 in package.json to address a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability.
  • Updated package-lock.json to reflect the changes in express version.
  • This upgrade fixes the vulnerability identified by Snyk with ID SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
package.json
Upgrade express dependency to address vulnerabilities       

packages/web-component-tester/package.json

  • Upgraded express dependency from version 4.15.3 to 4.20.0.
+1/-1     
package-lock.json
Update package-lock.json for express upgrade                         

packages/web-component-tester/package-lock.json

  • Updated lock file to reflect the upgrade of express to version 4.20.0.

  • +11976/-11896
    Additional files (token-limit)
    package-lock.json
    ...                                                                                                           

    packages/web-component-tester/package-lock.json

    ...

    +11976/-11896

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    …ent-tester/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities
    
    The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
    - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-PATHTOREGEXP-7925106
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ No key issues to review

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Enhancement
    Update multiple dependencies to their latest compatible versions

    Consider updating other dependencies to their latest compatible versions as well, to
    ensure all packages are up-to-date and working together smoothly.

    packages/web-component-tester/package.json [65-68]

     "express": "^4.20.0",
    +"chalk": "^4.1.2",
    +"glob": "^8.0.3",
    +"lodash": "^4.17.21",
     
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: The suggestion to update other dependencies is reasonable for maintaining up-to-date packages, which can improve security and compatibility. However, it is not crucial and does not address a specific issue in the current PR, which focuses on updating the 'express' dependency. Therefore, it receives a moderate score. The 'existing_code' field is valid, but the 'improved_code' section suggests changes not present in the PR diff.

    5

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Sep 18, 2024

    CI Failure Feedback 🧐

    (Checks updated until commit 4a4730e)

    Action: test (ubuntu-latest)

    Failed stage: Run npm run bootstrap [❌]

    Failure summary:

    The action failed due to an error during the npm ci command execution within the 'wct-mocha'
    package:

  • The command npm ci exited with code 1, indicating a failure.
  • Multiple deprecated packages were detected, which might contribute to the failure.
  • The error message suggests checking the npm logs for more detailed information.

  • Relevant error logs:
    1:  ##[group]Operating System
    2:  Ubuntu
    ...
    
    563:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: this library is no longer supported
    564:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: Glob versions prior to v9 are no longer supported
    565:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This module is no longer supported.
    566:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This package is no longer supported.
    567:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This package is no longer supported.
    568:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.
    569:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This package is no longer supported.
    570:  npm WARN deprecated [email protected]: This package is no longer supported.
    571:  npm WARN deprecated @lerna/[email protected]: Package no longer supported. Contact Support at https://www.npmjs.com/support for more info.
    ...
    
    747:  npm ERR! 
    748:  npm ERR! aliases: clean-install, ic, install-clean, isntall-clean
    749:  npm ERR! 
    750:  npm ERR! Run "npm help ci" for more info
    751:  npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in:
    752:  npm ERR!     /home/runner/.npm/_logs/2024-09-18T19_54_10_475Z-debug-0.log
    753:  lerna ERR! npm ci exited 1 in 'wct-mocha'
    754:  lerna WARN complete Waiting for 1 child process to exit. CTRL-C to exit immediately.
    755:  ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1.
    

    ✨ CI feedback usage guide:

    The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
    The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

    • Failed stage
    • Failed test name
    • Failure summary
    • Relevant error logs

    In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

    /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"
    

    where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

    Configuration options

    • enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
    • excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
    • enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
    • persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
    • final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

    See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants