docs: add a PR template

[joanise]

Q	A
Goal?	Add a PR template so PR submitters provide more information
Fixes?	N/A
Feedback sought?	Is this format OK?, are the additional details in comments annoying or useful?
Priority?	normal
Tests added?	N/A
How to test?	Won't work until merged, but can be tested on my just-testing repo
Confidence?	medium - format is not perfect, and I wish it aligned better where the user is filling out this form.

Do you think this PR should trigger a Major (Breaking Change)/Minor (New Feature)/patch (refactor/bug fix) version change? No

[github-actions]

CLI load time: 0:00.27
Pull Request HEAD: 48def6c541157b26c9ecab5dc7cbedb6dfc82cff
Imports that take more than 0.1 s:
import time: self [us] | cumulative | imported package

[joanise]

Note: the table is now weirdly mis-aligned when you look at it in fixed font, but that makes it roughly align in the default view you get when you use it to submit a PR, since GH uses a variable-font editor.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.81%. Comparing base (7d3d8de) to head (48def6c).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #391      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.15%   71.81%   -1.34%     
==========================================
  Files          43       43              
  Lines        2786     2973     +187     
  Branches      459      520      +61     
==========================================
+ Hits         2038     2135      +97     
- Misses        664      749      +85     
- Partials       84       89       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[roedoejet]

just one comment, thanks @joanise !

[roedoejet]

the pipes are not aligned here - can we format it so that even in the raw text format they appear aligned? Also I think we can expand Q and A to "Question" and "Answer since we have space.

[joanise]

If we align them in fixed width, they look like this in the PR comment editor:

What I did here was align them as best as I could in the PR comment editor, so now they look ugly in the fixed width view. I don't know how to make it align OK in both views.

Agreed for spelling Question and Answer in full.

[joanise]

By contrast, this is what it looks like with the current version:

I could move it to this:

but I don't think we'll like it if I make it align perfectly in fixed width.

[roedoejet]

ok it doesn't look like that for me when I click on your link to the PR:

[joanise]

Rewritten with visible headings instead of a table that I can't get to align nicely.
Test link for this variant: https://github.com/joanise/just-testing/compare/main...dev.gzip-on-ci-all-OSs?expand=1&template=visible_headings.md

[roedoejet]

Looks great - thanks for continuing to wrestle with the formatting @joanise !