Skip to content

Comments

Handling of BatchFuture validity constant for batches in the Streamer#162

Merged
philippecamacho merged 1 commit intocelo-integration-rebase-13from
philippe/remove-batch-future-case
May 29, 2025
Merged

Handling of BatchFuture validity constant for batches in the Streamer#162
philippecamacho merged 1 commit intocelo-integration-rebase-13from
philippe/remove-batch-future-case

Conversation

@philippecamacho
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes https://app.asana.com/1/1208976916964769/project/1209392461754458/task/1210114467360887?focus=true

This PR:

Increases the log level to Error if a batch is assigned the BatchFuture constant after verification as this should not happen.

Key places to review:

All changes.

How to test this PR:

just espresso-tests

…nstant after verification as this should not happen.
@philippecamacho philippecamacho requested a review from shenkeyao May 29, 2025 00:17
@philippecamacho philippecamacho merged commit 91f9a05 into celo-integration-rebase-13 May 29, 2025
18 of 29 checks passed
@philippecamacho philippecamacho deleted the philippe/remove-batch-future-case branch May 29, 2025 00:25
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
dailinsubjam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2025
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2026
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
shenkeyao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2026
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
QuentinI pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2026
…nstant (#162)

The reason is that it should not happen as the CheckBatch does not return BatchFuture.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants