Skip to content

This repository will include Jupyter notebooks that compare robustness of the OpenPIV algorithms

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

ErichZimmer/test_robustness

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

20 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Test robustness of an algorithm

This repository will include Jupyter notebooks that compare robustness of the OpenPIV algorithms

The need is due to the issue OpenPIV/openpiv-python#162 after the update to ver 0.23.0 (see release https://github.com/OpenPIV/openpiv-python/releases/tag/0.23.0)

The algorithms have not changed substantially, we basically moved the algorithm used in windef.py to the pyprocess.py. The differences are due to the change in the decision of what defines the final grid, the search_area_size or window_size, i.e. the interrogation window in frame A or in frame B if the last one is larger (what is called extended search). So now the window in frame B is always symmetric around window in frame A, thus we do not introduce bias at the edges of the images.

Additional change is the intensity capping that is easy to remove, but to do so wisely (there is also a pending pull request of normalized_correlation see https://github.com/OpenPIV/openpiv-python/tree/normalized_correlation) but this one maybe more robust but fails some tests. Without understanding the reason, we might find ourselves in another bug issue. We also opened just this "small" change with the new pull request - how to compare the two? https://github.com/OpenPIV/openpiv-python/tree/remove_capping

What to do:

  1. Create Jupyter notebook that reads the data, installs the right version of openpiv-python and runs all the tests
  2. Create notebook per set of data that @ErichZimmer suggested:

    To Reproduce
    Note: The GUI used and windef script (executed in jupyter) had the same results
    settings used:

    first PIV Challenge (2001) case A:
    link to image set
    preprocessing: None
    correlation: FFT, no padding
    search area: None
    windowing: 64>32>16
    overlap: 32>16>8 (50%)
    validation: "disabled" by large values
    outlier replacement iteration: 5
    outlier replacement kernel: 2

    first PIV Challenge (2001) case B:
    link to image set
    preprocessing: None
    correlation: FFT, no padding
    search area: None
    windowing: 64>32>16
    overlap: 32>16>8 (50%)
    validation: "disabled" by large values
    outlier replacement iteration: 5
    outlier replacement kernel: 2

    OpenPIV python test 4
    preprocessing: None
    correlation: FFT, no padding
    search area: None
    windowing: 64>32>16
    overlap: 32>16>8 (50%)
    validation: "disabled" by large values
    outlier replacement iteration: 5
    outlier replacement kernel: 2

About

This repository will include Jupyter notebooks that compare robustness of the OpenPIV algorithms

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Jupyter Notebook 100.0%