-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Auth #99
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Auth #99
Conversation
What is the lure of supporting an old version of MySQL on the main master branch? While I recognize there are people who need support, I am much more inclined to say that it is better to keep this separate from the main repository. Please educate me: Is there anyone using such an old version, and why are they doing so? |
MySQL 4.0.27 is used in the hosting company (mtw.ru) where I work for some our clients. They use websites that are not adapdted to the Mysql 4.1+. It sounds unbelievable, but true. I want to work with some databases on such servers. I understand that now rare to find a similar problem, but do not exclude the possibility. There are other advantages in these patch:
|
I'll look at this when I next integrate patches. I tend to batch them up. I'll probably take a look around the 20th or so. |
I have not forgotten this patch, but I'll do it in the next batch when #102 comes back as well :) |
Does this still have support? I'll get it in if possible, but I really really really want to rewrite a lot of the code, which means if it can be pushed to "later" it would be much better. |
Ok, lets write my code after your changes. |
I went over |
It is improved version of module emysql_auth + coverage tests. Emysql_auth adapted for the MySQL 3.23-4.1