Update DynamicPPL version in Project.toml

[wsmoses]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Benchmark Results

	main	905062d...	main / 905062d...
basics/make_zero/namedtuple	0.0529 ± 0.0026 μs	0.0528 ± 0.0025 μs	1 ± 0.069
basics/make_zero/struct	0.25 ± 0.0061 μs	0.253 ± 0.0057 μs	0.988 ± 0.033
basics/overhead	4.34 ± 0.01 ns	4.34 ± 0.01 ns	1 ± 0.0033
basics/remake_zero!/namedtuple	0.24 ± 0.0091 μs	0.24 ± 0.011 μs	0.998 ± 0.059
basics/remake_zero!/struct	0.231 ± 0.0078 μs	0.233 ± 0.01 μs	0.991 ± 0.055
fold_broadcast/multidim_sum_bcast/1D	10.3 ± 0.25 μs	10.3 ± 0.25 μs	1 ± 0.035
fold_broadcast/multidim_sum_bcast/2D	12.3 ± 0.3 μs	12.2 ± 0.29 μs	1.01 ± 0.034
time_to_load	1.26 ± 0.0042 s	1.26 ± 0.0092 s	1 ± 0.008

Benchmark Plots

A plot of the benchmark results has been uploaded as an artifact at https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl/actions/runs/18605381941/artifacts/4304301108.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 75.14%. Comparing base (0d9ed77) to head (905062d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2673   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.14%   75.14%           
=======================================
  Files          57       57           
  Lines       17958    17958           
=======================================
  Hits        13495    13495           
  Misses       4463     4463           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[giordano]

The extension isn't really tested, is it?

[penelopeysm]

The extension isn't really tested, is it?

No, also it's type piracy.

This compat bound is making DynamicPPL CI fail on a number of PRs. I tested with Enzyme 0.13.86 manually and the error has already been fixed in some recent patch. So the compat needs to be fixed or I'll have to start removing Enzyme from our CI benchmarks

[wsmoses]

It should be testable once #1813 goes through (which relatedly, gently ping) @penelopeysm per our convo on slack where this PR was created to unblock you I’m going to go ahead and merge and figure out how do to the “version compat through up to 0.50 or something” in a follow up PR

…

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:32 PM Penelope Yong ***@***.***> wrote: *penelopeysm* left a comment (EnzymeAD/Enzyme.jl#2673) <#2673 (comment)> The extension isn't really tested, is it? No, also it's type piracy. This compat bound is making DynamicPPL CI fail on a number of PRs. I tested with Enzyme 0.13.86 manually and the error has already been fixed in some recent patch. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#2673 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJTUXFIE27UPJLVZNYTIOT3YYRXVAVCNFSM6AAAAACJQRFGUWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTIMRWGM3TAMRSG4> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>