-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Formatting for books with many versions #2353
Comments
I agree, I think they should be visually grouped. Here's a thought: sublists, most recent book first. One example:
|
that seems reasonable. Could you take a look at what the linter says about that? https://github.com/vhf/free-programming-books-lint |
I changed my mind, making the latest version the toplist element and the previous versions the sublist elements. I'll do a PR and you can tell me what you think. The linter didn't find any issues :) For reference: PR #2517 |
* Python books: Formatting for multiple editions * added ref to issue 2353 * .
Thanks everyone who contributed, the suggestions are now implemented! |
…oundation#2521) * Python books: Formatting for multiple editions * added ref to issue 2353 * .
…bookFoundation#2517) * Python books: Formatting for multiple editions * added ref to issue 2353
…oundation#2521) * Python books: Formatting for multiple editions * added ref to issue 2353 * .
…bookFoundation#2517) * Python books: Formatting for multiple editions * added ref to issue 2353
I have found an issue. When we have a title with more than 3 editions, we can't list them in descending chronological order, due to the rule "titles must be in alphabetical order". For example, in the #5299 PR, my first commit could not pass Travis CI because it contains:
I have to make a new commit to rearrange the editions and add
The new commit passed the Travis-CI but the old editions are not in descending chronological order. Are you okay with ascending chronological order of old editions? If not, you should limit the rule "titles must be in alphabetical order" to level 1 titles only. |
Many books, especially manuals, have an edition for every version of the software. Some of our lists are presenting one entry per version(for example PR #2350 ), others are only listing the latest version, sometimes a single link for multiple versions is presented.
What's the best way for these to be listed? When is a version so old we should omit it? Should the the practice be different for different language lists?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: