Skip to content

Tech Note: Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes#3220

Merged
samsrabin merged 4 commits into
ESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3035
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

Tech Note: Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes#3220
samsrabin merged 4 commits into
ESCOMP:b4b-devfrom
olyson:docs-I3035

Conversation

@olyson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@olyson olyson commented Jun 3, 2025

Description of changes

Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes tech note documentation

Specific notes

Contributors other than yourself, if any: @bishtgautam

CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):

Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No

Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No

Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? Yes, yes.

Testing performed, if any:
Built and view documentation locally.

@olyson olyson requested a review from samsrabin June 3, 2025 17:58
@olyson olyson added documentation additions or edits to user-facing documentation or its infrastructure size: small docs:minor-tech-fix Minor technical fix needed to documentation content (e.g. broken link, broken rendering) docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) labels Jun 3, 2025
@samsrabin samsrabin changed the title Fix documentation issue #3035 Tech Note: Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes Jun 3, 2025
@samsrabin samsrabin moved this to In review in CLM documentation Jun 3, 2025
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg added the b4b bit-for-bit label Jan 13, 2026
@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Immediately after an upcoming b4b-dev merge to master, I would update this PR to the latest master and rebase to b4b-dev.

@samsrabin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@slevis-lmwg Mind if I ask why? This seems independent of anything else on b4b-dev or master.

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg changed the base branch from master to b4b-dev January 14, 2026 16:43
@slevis-lmwg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@samsrabin you were correct, rebasing did not mess anything up, thanks!

@olyson olyson added the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Feb 5, 2026
@wwieder
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

wwieder commented Feb 5, 2026

@slevis-lmwg can you review?
@samsrabin do you want to merge to b4b-dev?

@samsrabin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Sure, will do.

@samsrabin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Actually, @slevis-lmwg says he won't be able to get to it today, so it'll come in next time.

@samsrabin samsrabin requested a review from slevis-lmwg February 5, 2026 18:24
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@samsrabin pls check whether I pointed out actual or only perceived inconsistencies.

Comment thread doc/source/tech_note/Radiative_Fluxes/CLM50_Tech_Note_Radiative_Fluxes.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/source/tech_note/Radiative_Fluxes/CLM50_Tech_Note_Radiative_Fluxes.rst Outdated
Comment thread doc/source/tech_note/Radiative_Fluxes/CLM50_Tech_Note_Radiative_Fluxes.rst Outdated
@samsrabin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@olyson Please ping me when this is ready for review and I'll do a test build.

@olyson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

olyson commented Feb 10, 2026

@olyson Please ping me when this is ready for review and I'll do a test build.

@samsrabin , this can be re-reviewed. Thanks!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy to approve (without looking in detail this time).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@samsrabin samsrabin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

@samsrabin samsrabin self-requested a review February 11, 2026 19:16
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@samsrabin samsrabin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I see now a test failed... Checking.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@samsrabin samsrabin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Huh. Now I'm not seeing the failed test. Approving.

@samsrabin samsrabin merged commit 9e70bc8 into ESCOMP:b4b-dev Feb 11, 2026
6 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from In review to Done in CLM documentation Feb 11, 2026
@samsrabin samsrabin removed the next this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting. label Feb 19, 2026
@slevis-lmwg slevis-lmwg mentioned this pull request Feb 20, 2026
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

b4b bit-for-bit docs:minor-tech-fix Minor technical fix needed to documentation content (e.g. broken link, broken rendering) docs-loc:tech-note Relates to Technical Note (science) documentation additions or edits to user-facing documentation or its infrastructure size: small

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Typo in the longwave radiation documentation for vegetated surfaces

4 participants