Tech Note: Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes#3220
Conversation
|
Immediately after an upcoming b4b-dev merge to master, I would update this PR to the latest master and rebase to b4b-dev. |
|
@slevis-lmwg Mind if I ask why? This seems independent of anything else on b4b-dev or master. |
|
@samsrabin you were correct, rebasing did not mess anything up, thanks! |
|
@slevis-lmwg can you review? |
|
Sure, will do. |
|
Actually, @slevis-lmwg says he won't be able to get to it today, so it'll come in next time. |
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@samsrabin pls check whether I pointed out actual or only perceived inconsistencies.
|
@olyson Please ping me when this is ready for review and I'll do a test build. |
@samsrabin , this can be re-reviewed. Thanks! |
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Happy to approve (without looking in detail this time).
samsrabin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actually, I see now a test failed... Checking.
samsrabin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Huh. Now I'm not seeing the failed test. Approving.
Description of changes
Distinguish between time step and iteration level in vegetation longwave and fluxes tech note documentation
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @bishtgautam
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? Yes, yes.
Testing performed, if any:
Built and view documentation locally.