Set eflx_building_lun to spval properly#2806
Conversation
slevis-lmwg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@olyson I will approve preemptively, though I know that you're investigating a strange test-failure.
|
I tried that test above with ctsm5.3.002 and it passed as expected. I then ran it 3 times with my branch and all passed. So must have been some kind of glitch. |
|
Testing after rebasing to b4b-dev: "Unexpected" failures on Derecho: FAIL SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist--clm-matrixcnOn BASELINE ctsm5.3.002: ERROR BFAIL baseline directory '/glade/campaign/cgd/tss/ctsm_baselines/ctsm5.3.002/SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist--clm-matrixcnOn' does not exist FAIL SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist BASELINE ctsm5.3.002: ERROR BFAIL baseline directory '/glade/campaign/cgd/tss/ctsm_baselines/ctsm5.3.002/SMS_D_Ld1.ne30pg3_t232.I1850Clm50BgcSpinup.derecho_intel.clm-cplhist' does not exist FAIL ERS_Ly3.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm60BgcCropCmip6.derecho_intel.clm-basic BASELINE ctsm5.3.002: ERROR BFAIL baseline directory '/glade/campaign/cgd/tss/ctsm_baselines/ctsm5.3.002/ERS_Ly3.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm60BgcCropCmip6.derecho_intel.clm-basic' does not exist FAIL SMS_Lm1.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm60BgcCropCmip6waccm.derecho_gnu.clm-basic BASELINE ctsm5.3.002: ERROR BFAIL baseline directory '/glade/campaign/cgd/tss/ctsm_baselines/ctsm5.3.002/SMS_Lm1.f10_f10_mg37.I1850Clm60BgcCropCmip6waccm.derecho_gnu.clm-basic' does not exist PEND SMS_Ld10_D_Mmpi-serial.CLM_USRDAT.I1PtClm60Bgc.derecho_gnu.clm-NEON-MOAB--clm-PRISM SHAREDLIB_BUILD (UNEXPECTED: expected FAIL) Since none of these failures appear to be related to this PR, I'm merging this into b4b-dev |
Description of changes
Set eflx_building_lun to spval properly
Specific notes
Contributors other than yourself, if any: @cathyxinchangli
CTSM Issues Fixed (include github issue #):
Are answers expected to change (and if so in what way)? No
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)? No
Does this create a need to change or add documentation? Did you do so? No
Testing performed, if any:
Ran aux_clm.
Unexpected failures:
These failed because there was one variable not bfb, DPFCT_ROCK.
Unsure why that would be different.