fixes to land ice runoff in budget table#180
Merged
Merged
Conversation
jedwards4b
approved these changes
May 5, 2021
Collaborator
Author
|
@DeniseWorthen - I have taken you off as a reviewer since we communicated in email that there was no impact for UFS with this PR. |
korsbakken
pushed a commit
to korsbakken/CMEPS
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2025
…drof, dwav (ESCOMP#180) * add skip_restart functionality to all components that can use it
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes
This fixes the budget table to have the correct land ice runoff value and balance the runoff sent to the ocean.
Specific notes
This PR does not affect any UFS configuration, since the UFS does not use the budget tables at this point.
Contributors other than yourself, if any:
CMEPS Issues Fixed:
Fixes #179
Are changes expected to change answers?
Any User Interface Changes (namelist or namelist defaults changes)?
Testing performed if application target is CESM:(either UFS-S2S or CESM testing is required):
Ran a B1850 f19_g17 case for 3 months and verified that the budget table looked correct with this term
Testing performed if application target is UFS-coupled:
Hashes used for testing: