Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add option to use containerd snapshotter to generate SBOMs #1290
Add option to use containerd snapshotter to generate SBOMs #1290
Changes from all commits
4fbc92f
59712b1
0eb307f
daad8c7
11fedcd
c42168e
3ab20a4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like the option name does not exactly represent what it does. Using
mount
has different facets (more performant, more permissions, etc.) and perhaps in the future we'll have another way to support uncompressed layers while still offering themount
option.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is intended: the idea of this flag is more to make the feature work in the case of discarded layers. This will allow us to more to a better solution in the future. Naming it
mountImages
would make the migration more complex as we wouldn't know if the feature was specifically request or if it's because it was used as a workaround.Does it make sense ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It makes sense to have a dedicated
uncompressedLayersSupport
that activatesuseMount
. What does not make sense is thatuseMount
does not exist.I know we did not advertise this option before, but I believe it should have its own existence and we could put in the docstring that
uncompressedLayersSupport
impliesuseMount
, with the proper explanation onuseMount
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets continue this discussion about the
useMount
option or equivalent for another PR, and merge this one. so we can provide an easy configuration for users already