Skip to content

Conversation

@erikayasuda
Copy link
Collaborator

@erikayasuda erikayasuda commented Jul 8, 2024

Manual backport for #9440

Checklist

  • Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
  • Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR
  • Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability)
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Library release note guidelines are followed or label changelog/no-changelog is set
  • Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, public corp docs)
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)
  • If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified @DataDog/apm-tees.

Reviewer Checklist

  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Description motivates each change
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance
    policy

…eline isn't supported yet (#9440)

Next week I'll finally add support for testing some of these new
interface. Moreover, at the current time this stuff is pretty much only
for internal testing, so I'll document when we're closer to going
public.

The, uh, framing for this is kind of weird.  I'm sorry about that.

- [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
- [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included
in the PR
- [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage,
maintainability)
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [x] [Library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set
- [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public
corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/))
- [x] Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))
- [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified
`@DataDog/apm-tees`.

- [ ] Title is accurate
- [ ] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- [ ] Description motivates each change
- [ ] Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- [ ] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications
of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

---------

Co-authored-by: sanchda <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 360b469)
@erikayasuda erikayasuda changed the title chore(Profiling): add infrastructure for supporting timeline, but tim… chore(Profiling): add infrastructure for supporting timeline, but timeline isn't supported yet [backport 2.9] Jul 8, 2024
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-9440-to-2.9
Commit report: 7733827
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 1182 Passed, 378 Skipped, 23m 6.18s Total Time

@erikayasuda erikayasuda added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Jul 8, 2024
@erikayasuda erikayasuda marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2024 18:49
@erikayasuda erikayasuda requested review from a team as code owners July 8, 2024 18:49
@erikayasuda erikayasuda requested a review from emmettbutler July 8, 2024 18:49
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-07-08 19:50:07

Comparing candidate commit 7733827 in PR branch backport-9440-to-2.9 with baseline commit cc81c11 in branch 2.9.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 209 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

@taegyunkim
Copy link
Contributor

#9731 has been merged by picking up only necessary bits of this instead of backporting this. Closing..

@taegyunkim taegyunkim closed this Jul 8, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim deleted the backport-9440-to-2.9 branch July 8, 2024 20:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants