Skip to content

Conversation

@taegyunkim
Copy link
Contributor

@taegyunkim taegyunkim commented Jul 8, 2024

Manual Backport for #9440

Checklist

  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

…eline isn't supported yet (#9440)

Next week I'll finally add support for testing some of these new
interface. Moreover, at the current time this stuff is pretty much only
for internal testing, so I'll document when we're closer to going
public.

The, uh, framing for this is kind of weird.  I'm sorry about that.

- [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description
- [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included
in the PR
- [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage,
maintainability)
- [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [x] [Library release note
guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html)
are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set
- [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public
corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/))
- [x] Backport labels are set (if
[applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting))
- [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified
`@DataDog/apm-tees`.

- [ ] Title is accurate
- [ ] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
- [ ] Description motivates each change
- [ ] Avoids breaking
[API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces)
changes
- [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
- [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation)
- [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library
- [ ] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications
of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
- [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the
[release branch maintenance
policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)

---------

Co-authored-by: sanchda <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 360b469)
@taegyunkim taegyunkim force-pushed the backport-9440-to-2.8 branch from 05d01aa to f82d898 Compare July 8, 2024 18:38
@taegyunkim taegyunkim marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2024 18:49
@taegyunkim taegyunkim requested review from a team as code owners July 8, 2024 18:49
@taegyunkim taegyunkim requested a review from brettlangdon July 8, 2024 18:49
@taegyunkim taegyunkim added the changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR. label Jul 8, 2024
@datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn
Copy link

datadog-dd-trace-py-rkomorn bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: backport-9440-to-2.8
Commit report: f82d898
Test service: dd-trace-py

✅ 0 Failed, 1444 Passed, 31 Skipped, 34m 22.66s Total Time

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-07-08 19:46:53

Comparing candidate commit f82d898 in PR branch backport-9440-to-2.8 with baseline commit 81d0416 in branch 2.8.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 201 metrics, 9 unstable metrics.

@taegyunkim taegyunkim closed this Jul 8, 2024
@taegyunkim taegyunkim deleted the backport-9440-to-2.8 branch July 8, 2024 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog/no-changelog A changelog entry is not required for this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants