grpc: service representation naming

[amarziali]

What does this PR do?

This applies the service naming schema logic (see #2941) to grpc.

This PR relies on #3056 for the split into different files according to general area (messaging, storage) and a few optimizations to the service naming computation.

Motivation

Complete the service representation feature

Plugin Checklist

• Unit tests.

Additional Notes

[github-actions]

Overall package size

Self size: 4.74 MB
Deduped: 61.2 MB
No deduping: 61.25 MB

Dependency sizes

name	version	self size	total size
@datadog/pprof	2.2.3	14.25 MB	15.13 MB
@datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking	1.5.0	14.86 MB	14.86 MB
@datadog/native-appsec	3.2.0	13.38 MB	13.39 MB
protobufjs	7.1.2	2.76 MB	6.55 MB
@datadog/native-iast-rewriter	2.0.1	2.09 MB	2.1 MB
@opentelemetry/core	1.14.0	872.87 kB	1.47 MB
@datadog/native-metrics	2.0.0	898.77 kB	1.3 MB
@opentelemetry/api	1.4.1	780.32 kB	780.32 kB
opentracing	0.14.7	194.81 kB	194.81 kB
semver	7.5.3	93.39 kB	123.79 kB
@datadog/sketches-js	2.1.0	109.9 kB	109.9 kB
lodash.sortby	4.7.0	75.76 kB	75.76 kB
lru-cache	7.14.0	74.95 kB	74.95 kB
ipaddr.js	2.0.1	59.52 kB	59.52 kB
ignore	5.2.0	48.87 kB	48.87 kB
import-in-the-middle	1.3.5	34.34 kB	38.81 kB
istanbul-lib-coverage	3.2.0	29.34 kB	29.34 kB
retry	0.10.1	27.44 kB	27.44 kB
lodash.uniq	4.5.0	25.01 kB	25.01 kB
limiter	1.1.5	23.17 kB	23.17 kB
lodash.kebabcase	4.1.1	17.75 kB	17.75 kB
lodash.pick	4.4.0	16.33 kB	16.33 kB
node-abort-controller	3.0.1	14.33 kB	14.33 kB
crypto-randomuuid	1.0.0	11.18 kB	11.18 kB
diagnostics_channel	1.1.0	7.07 kB	7.07 kB
path-to-regexp	0.1.7	6.78 kB	6.78 kB
koalas	1.0.2	6.47 kB	6.47 kB
methods	1.1.2	5.29 kB	5.29 kB
module-details-from-path	1.0.3	4.47 kB	4.47 kB

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3327 (0ac5fcd) into master (6810871) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3327      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.04%   85.99%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines        7787     7791       +4     
  Branches       33       33              
==========================================
  Hits         6700     6700              
- Misses       1087     1091       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ages/dd-trace/src/service-naming/schemas/v0/web.js	42.85% <0.00%> (-17.15%)	⬇️
...ages/dd-trace/src/service-naming/schemas/v1/web.js	42.85% <0.00%> (-17.15%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Comparing candidate commit 0ac5fcd in PR branch andrea.marziali/naming-grpc with baseline commit 6810871 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 467 metrics, 25 unstable metrics.

[tlhunter]

It looks like the molecular errors are pretty real. Might it be due to the changes to setup/mocha.js?

[tlhunter]

It looks like the grpc errors are pretty real. I've been thrown off by the withNamingSchema() usage of done before as well.

     TypeError: done is not a function
      at Object.callback (packages/datadog-plugin-grpc/test/server.spec.js:87:66)

[tlhunter]

This looks like a bug? When the .then(done) above calls, it'll execute the done() function. However, when spanProducerFn(done) calls, it will also run done(). Running this function twice results in a test failure. Was it added accidentally?

[tlhunter]

Unless it's explicitly used for the purpose of failing tests and should always have a truthy argument?