-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 165
[Tracing] Instrument static methods defined in non-generic value types #7920
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
zacharycmontoya
merged 9 commits into
master
from
zach.montoya/instrument-static-valuetype
Feb 10, 2026
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ab368d3
Implement support for instrumenting static methods in value types in …
zacharycmontoya accc336
Set up the With0Arguments classes in CallTargetNativeTest to test tha…
zacharycmontoya da37999
Implement testing of static methods in structs for With1Arguments tes…
zacharycmontoya cbfdd00
Add tests for instrumenting methods with 2-9 arguments
zacharycmontoya 919ab1a
Add support for instrumenting static methods inside value types, wher…
zacharycmontoya c80005f
Apply suggestion from @andrewlock
zacharycmontoya d9dd260
Apply suggestion from @andrewlock
zacharycmontoya 9acf025
Apply suggestion from @andrewlock
zacharycmontoya b58ce81
PR Feedback: Add code comment in CallTargetNativeTest code to more cl…
zacharycmontoya File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For static methods on value types nested in generic parents,
GetCurrentTypeReffalls back tomdTokenNil, soWriteBeginMethod/EndMethodspecialize CallTarget withTTarget=object. This branch now always emitsinitobj+ldlocfor any value type, so the stack holds an unboxed struct while the calltarget method spec expectsobject, which can produce invalid IL/JIT failures when instrumentingOuter<T>.Inner.StaticMethod. Consider checking the generic-parent case (same condition used inGetCurrentTypeRef) and usingLoadNullor boxing instead of pushing the value type.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was useful as I didn't cover this edge case. Although we don't instrument this case today, in our
CallTargetNativeTestprogram we can enable this scenario. With the latest set of commits, we correctly handle this and load anullvalue as the CallTarget "instance" so we can in fact instrument this scenario.