Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tracing] add null checks when iterating headers in propagators #6460

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

lucaspimentel
Copy link
Member

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel commented Dec 19, 2024

Summary of changes

Add null checks in ParseUtility to avoid a NullReferenceException.

Reason for change

If a user passes a delegate to SpanContextExtractor which returns null enumerables, the methods in ParseUtility will throw a NullReferenceException when they try to iterate over the values with foreach.

For example, Dictionary<TKey, TValue>.GetValueOrDefault(TKey) can return null if TValue is nullable:

var dict = new Dictionary<string, List<string>>();
SpanContextExtractor.Extract(headers, (dict, key) => dict.GetValueOrDefault(key))

I noticed this while using manual instrumentation for system tests. The workaround I used at the time was to add a null-coalescing operator:

SpanContextExtractor.Extract(headers, (dict, key) => dict.GetValueOrDefault(key) ?? [])

Implementation details

Add nullability annotations and the missing check for null.

Test coverage

Expanded existing tests:

  • add test with null enumerable (confirmed that test failed before the fix and passed after)
  • unrelated to this change: add test with multiple values, ensure we use the first valid value

Other details

n/a

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) label Dec 19, 2024
@datadog-ddstaging
Copy link

datadog-ddstaging bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: lpimentel/ParseUtility-add-null-checks
Commit report: 8d1a69f
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

❌ 1 Failed (0 Known Flaky), 458117 Passed, 2818 Skipped, 19h 39m 26.49s Total Time

❌ Failed Tests (1)

  • TestInstrumentedUnitTests - Datadog.Trace.Security.IntegrationTests.Iast.IastInstrumentationUnitTests - Details

    Expand for error
     Expected exit code: 0, actual exit code: 1.
    

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Dec 19, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (69ms)  : 66, 72
     .   : milestone, 69,
    master - mean (69ms)  : 66, 72
     .   : milestone, 69,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (1,005ms)  : 983, 1026
     .   : milestone, 1005,
    master - mean (1,003ms)  : 976, 1030
     .   : milestone, 1003,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (103ms)  : 100, 106
     .   : milestone, 103,
    master - mean (103ms)  : 100, 105
     .   : milestone, 103,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (686ms)  : 666, 706
     .   : milestone, 686,
    master - mean (687ms)  : 670, 703
     .   : milestone, 687,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (89ms)  : 87, 90
     .   : milestone, 89,
    master - mean (89ms)  : 87, 91
     .   : milestone, 89,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (640ms)  : 621, 659
     .   : milestone, 640,
    master - mean (645ms)  : 628, 661
     .   : milestone, 645,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (191ms)  : 188, 195
     .   : milestone, 191,
    master - mean (190ms)  : 185, 196
     .   : milestone, 190,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (1,118ms)  : 1080, 1155
     .   : milestone, 1118,
    master - mean (1,106ms)  : 1078, 1134
     .   : milestone, 1106,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (270ms)  : 266, 275
     .   : milestone, 270,
    master - mean (270ms)  : 266, 274
     .   : milestone, 270,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (878ms)  : 850, 905
     .   : milestone, 878,
    master - mean (876ms)  : 847, 905
     .   : milestone, 876,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) - mean (263ms)  : 259, 266
     .   : milestone, 263,
    master - mean (262ms)  : 258, 266
     .   : milestone, 262,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6460) - mean (856ms)  : 822, 890
     .   : milestone, 856,
    master - mean (855ms)  : 826, 884
     .   : milestone, 855,

Loading

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Dec 19, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6460 compared to master:

  • 1 benchmarks are slower, with geometric mean 1.136
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.49μs 49.3ns 455ns 0.0164 0.00819 0 5.61 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.8μs 61.6ns 508ns 0.0158 0.00527 0 5.8 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.2μs 53.4ns 192ns 1.04 0.312 0.0961 6.21 KB
#6460 StartStopWithChild net6.0 8.48μs 49.2ns 400ns 0.0133 0.00442 0 5.61 KB
#6460 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 10.7μs 60.9ns 435ns 0.0202 0.0101 0 5.81 KB
#6460 StartStopWithChild net472 16.3μs 50.4ns 189ns 1.03 0.287 0.0819 6.2 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 498μs 360ns 1.3μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 678μs 180ns 649ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 871μs 836ns 3.13μs 0.437 0 0 3.3 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 497μs 273ns 1.06μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 653μs 574ns 2.22μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 857μs 612ns 2.37μs 0.428 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 131μs 364ns 1.41μs 0.199 0 0 14.48 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 146μs 276ns 1.07μs 0.215 0 0 17.27 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.000119ns 6.65E‑05ns 0.000258ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6460 SendRequest net6.0 132μs 221ns 858ns 0.13 0 0 14.47 KB
#6460 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 151μs 303ns 1.13μs 0.226 0 0 17.27 KB
#6460 SendRequest net472 0.000488ns 0.000283ns 0.0011ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 566μs 3.03μs 16.3μs 0.584 0 0 41.57 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 702μs 3.93μs 32.4μs 0.342 0 0 41.74 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 844μs 4.03μs 15.6μs 8.39 2.52 0.419 53.26 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 579μs 2.93μs 13.4μs 0.571 0 0 41.55 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 670μs 3.53μs 17.3μs 0.334 0 0 41.76 KB
#6460 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 863μs 2.54μs 9.49μs 8.25 2.6 0.434 53.27 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.28μs 0.63ns 2.27ns 0.0142 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.81μs 1.48ns 5.32ns 0.0137 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.1μs 3.26ns 12.6ns 0.156 0.00105 0 987 B
#6460 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.27μs 1.02ns 3.96ns 0.0141 0 0 1.02 KB
#6460 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.87μs 2.81ns 10.9ns 0.0138 0 0 1.02 KB
#6460 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.08μs 1.44ns 5.39ns 0.156 0.00103 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.28μs 0.307ns 1.11ns 0.0134 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.66μs 0.608ns 2.28ns 0.0133 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.59μs 1.32ns 4.93ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.27μs 0.699ns 2.71ns 0.0134 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.53μs 0.588ns 2.12ns 0.0139 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.64μs 3.53ns 13.7ns 0.167 0 0 1.05 KB
#6460 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.27μs 0.727ns 2.81ns 0.0134 0 0 976 B
#6460 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.56μs 0.727ns 2.72ns 0.0128 0 0 976 B
#6460 CallElasticsearch net472 2.57μs 2.15ns 8.32ns 0.157 0 0 995 B
#6460 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.23μs 0.817ns 3.06ns 0.0129 0 0 952 B
#6460 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.65μs 0.884ns 3.31ns 0.0141 0 0 1.02 KB
#6460 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.6μs 1.63ns 6.31ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.32μs 0.607ns 2.27ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.67μs 0.489ns 1.69ns 0.0125 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.85μs 0.478ns 1.72ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6460 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.2μs 1.54ns 5.76ns 0.0133 0 0 952 B
#6460 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.69μs 0.58ns 2.17ns 0.0127 0 0 952 B
#6460 ExecuteAsync net472 1.91μs 0.618ns 2.23ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.26μs 1.24ns 4.28ns 0.032 0 0 2.31 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.34μs 1.27ns 4.57ns 0.0373 0 0 2.85 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.45μs 2.51ns 9.73ns 0.496 0 0 3.12 KB
#6460 SendAsync net6.0 4.35μs 2.77ns 10.7ns 0.0326 0 0 2.31 KB
#6460 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.45μs 2.77ns 10.7ns 0.0384 0 0 2.85 KB
#6460 SendAsync net472 7.44μs 1.14ns 4.12ns 0.496 0 0 3.12 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.48μs 1.2ns 4.48ns 0.0229 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.19μs 0.963ns 3.6ns 0.0229 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.63μs 0.704ns 2.64ns 0.249 0 0 1.57 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.52μs 2.99ns 11.2ns 0.0226 0 0 1.64 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.3μs 1.51ns 5.84ns 0.022 0 0 1.64 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net472 2.63μs 0.92ns 3.44ns 0.25 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 112μs 213ns 824ns 0.0553 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 165ns 640ns 0.0587 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 149μs 180ns 698ns 0.663 0.221 0 4.46 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net6.0 114μs 68.6ns 266ns 0.0567 0 0 4.28 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 116μs 175ns 678ns 0.0583 0 0 4.28 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net472 150μs 152ns 588ns 0.673 0.224 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.03μs 0.9ns 3.48ns 0.0318 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.22μs 1.48ns 5.35ns 0.0296 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.98μs 0.908ns 3.4ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net6.0 3.19μs 1.82ns 6.57ns 0.03 0 0 2.2 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.11μs 1.64ns 6.12ns 0.0306 0 0 2.2 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net472 4.75μs 1.87ns 7.24ns 0.321 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.49μs 1.37ns 5.3ns 0.0157 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.8μs 0.741ns 2.77ns 0.0153 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.09μs 0.741ns 2.87ns 0.184 0 0 1.16 KB
#6460 SendReceive net6.0 1.37μs 0.496ns 1.92ns 0.0157 0 0 1.14 KB
#6460 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.86μs 0.988ns 3.83ns 0.0149 0 0 1.14 KB
#6460 SendReceive net472 1.98μs 1.27ns 4.91ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.78μs 0.736ns 2.75ns 0.0222 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.94μs 2.1ns 8.11ns 0.0218 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.26μs 2.41ns 9.32ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.68μs 0.767ns 2.87ns 0.0215 0 0 1.6 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.8μs 3.48ns 13.5ns 0.0227 0 0 1.65 KB
#6460 EnrichedLog net472 4.25μs 3.12ns 12.1ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Slower ⚠️ Same allocations ✔️

Slower ⚠️ in #6460

Benchmark diff/base Base Median (ns) Diff Median (ns) Modality
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope‑net6.0 1.136 481.30 546.97

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 468ns 0.142ns 0.513ns 0.00813 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 587ns 0.343ns 1.33ns 0.00764 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 635ns 0.279ns 1.08ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 481ns 0.128ns 0.496ns 0.00979 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 695ns 1.89ns 7.3ns 0.00938 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 811ns 0.679ns 2.63ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6460 StartFinishSpan net6.0 474ns 0.237ns 0.918ns 0.00796 0 0 576 B
#6460 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 622ns 0.342ns 1.28ns 0.00781 0 0 576 B
#6460 StartFinishSpan net472 597ns 0.19ns 0.736ns 0.0916 0 0 578 B
#6460 StartFinishScope net6.0 547ns 0.139ns 0.521ns 0.00982 0 0 696 B
#6460 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 746ns 0.38ns 1.42ns 0.00926 0 0 696 B
#6460 StartFinishScope net472 802ns 0.544ns 2.11ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 613ns 0.304ns 1.18ns 0.00994 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 928ns 0.298ns 1.11ns 0.00909 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 0.364ns 1.41ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6460 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 620ns 0.278ns 1.08ns 0.00971 0 0 696 B
#6460 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 958ns 1.99ns 7.72ns 0.0094 0 0 696 B
#6460 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 0.209ns 0.808ns 0.105 0 0 658 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) (11.204M)   : 0, 11203962
    master (11.249M)   : 0, 11248712
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.033M)   : 0, 11032866

    section Automatic
    This PR (6460) (7.138M)   : 0, 7138385
    master (7.347M)   : 0, 7347049
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.786M)   : 0, 7785853

    section Trace stats
    master (7.654M)   : 0, 7654087

    section Manual
    master (11.190M)   : 0, 11189743

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6460) (6.590M)   : 0, 6589779
    master (6.679M)   : 0, 6679400

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.188M)   : 0, 10188440

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) (9.616M)   : 0, 9615615
    master (9.530M)   : 0, 9530088
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.495M)   : 0, 9494821

    section Automatic
    This PR (6460) (6.411M)   : 0, 6411024
    master (6.231M)   : 0, 6230985

    section Trace stats
    master (6.683M)   : 0, 6683249

    section Manual
    master (9.386M)   : 0, 9386293

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6460) (5.924M)   : 0, 5924341
    master (5.912M)   : 0, 5912138

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.814M)   : 0, 8813827

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6460) (10.229M)   : 0, 10229010
    master (10.112M)   : 0, 10112273
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.020M)   : 0, 10019592

    section Automatic
    This PR (6460) (6.581M)   : 0, 6581383
    master (6.311M)   : 0, 6310709
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.255M)   : 0, 7255257

    section Trace stats
    master (7.120M)   : 0, 7119600

    section Manual
    master (9.566M)   : 0, 9565510

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6460) (6.215M)   : 0, 6214602
    master (6.208M)   : 0, 6208407

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.215M)   : 0, 9215486

Loading

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: lpimentel/ParseUtility-add-null-checks
Commit report: 4a894e1
Test service: dd-trace-dotnet

✅ 0 Failed, 246093 Passed, 2374 Skipped, 20h 7m 26.9s Total Time
❄️ 17 New Flaky

New Flaky Tests (17)

  • IntegrationDisabled - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AdoNet.SystemDataSqliteTests - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     
     ---- System.OutOfMemoryException : Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
    
  • AspNetCoreMvc30TestsNoQueryString.MeetsAllAspNetCoreMvcExpectations - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetCore - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     
     ---- System.OutOfMemoryException : Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
    
  • AspNetCoreMvc30TestsQueryString.MeetsAllAspNetCoreMvcExpectations - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetCore - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     
     ---- System.OutOfMemoryException : Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
    
  • MeetsAllAspNetCoreMvcExpectations - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetCore.AspNetCoreMvc31TestsCallTargetWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     
     ---- System.OutOfMemoryException : Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
    
  • MeetsAllAspNetCoreMvcExpectations - Datadog.Trace.ClrProfiler.IntegrationTests.AspNetCore.AspNetCoreMvc31TestsCallTargetWithFeatureFlag - Last Failure

    Expand for error
     
     ---- System.OutOfMemoryException : Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown.
    

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel force-pushed the lpimentel/ParseUtility-add-null-checks branch from 1628997 to 4a894e1 Compare March 6, 2025 17:24
@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2025 17:29
@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 17:29
@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel requested a review from a team March 6, 2025 17:36
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel merged commit 1aff83b into master Mar 7, 2025
145 of 146 checks passed
@lucaspimentel lucaspimentel deleted the lpimentel/ParseUtility-add-null-checks branch March 7, 2025 01:09
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) type:bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants