Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Synthetics endpoint to fetch uptimes in API spec #1984

Merged

Conversation

api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

end

if attributes.key?(:'history')
if (value = attributes[:'history']).is_a?(Array)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using Array() to ensure the type is that of an array (...read more)

The rule "Use Array() to ensure your variable is an array" is important for ensuring your code behaves as expected, regardless of the type of data it receives. It is common in Ruby to need to iterate through an array of items. However, if the variable is not an array, this can lead to unexpected behavior or errors.

The Array() method in Ruby is a Kernel method that converts its argument to an Array. If the argument is already an Array, it returns the argument. If the argument is nil, it returns an empty Array. This can be used to ensure that a variable is an array before trying to iterate over it, preventing potential errors or unexpected behavior.

By using Array(foos), you can ensure that foos is an array before you try to iterate over it with each. This prevents the need to check if foos is an array with foos.is_a?(Array) and makes your code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

end

if attributes.key?(:'public_ids')
if (value = attributes[:'public_ids']).is_a?(Array)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using Array() to ensure the type is that of an array (...read more)

The rule "Use Array() to ensure your variable is an array" is important for ensuring your code behaves as expected, regardless of the type of data it receives. It is common in Ruby to need to iterate through an array of items. However, if the variable is not an array, this can lead to unexpected behavior or errors.

The Array() method in Ruby is a Kernel method that converts its argument to an Array. If the argument is already an Array, it returns the argument. If the argument is nil, it returns an empty Array. This can be used to ensure that a variable is an array before trying to iterate over it, preventing potential errors or unexpected behavior.

By using Array(foos), you can ensure that foos is an array before you try to iterate over it with each. This prevents the need to check if foos is an array with foos.is_a?(Array) and makes your code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

# @param body [SyntheticsFetchUptimesPayload] Public ID list of the Synthetic tests and timeframe.
# @param opts [Hash] the optional parameters
# @return [Array<(Array<SyntheticsTestUptime>, Integer, Hash)>] Array<SyntheticsTestUptime> data, response status code and response headers
def fetch_uptimes_with_http_info(body, opts = {})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Avoid using a hash as an optional parameter (...read more)

The rule "Avoid hash optional parameters" is a guideline that encourages developers to explicitly declare parameters instead of using a hash for optional parameters. This is because using a hash for optional parameters can make the code harder to understand and maintain. It can also lead to unexpected behavior if a developer accidentally includes a key in the hash that the method does not expect.

This rule is important because it promotes code readability and maintainability. It also helps prevent potential bugs that may occur due to unexpected keys in the optional hash. By explicitly declaring each parameter, developers can easily see what parameters a method expects, making the code easier to read and understand.

To adhere to this rule, instead of using a hash for optional parameters, explicitly declare each parameter in the method definition. For example, instead of using options = {} in the method definition, declare each parameter like name, email, age. This way, anyone reading the code can easily understand what parameters the method expects and in what order.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

Comment on lines +749 to +761
"v1.FetchUptimes" => {
"body" => "SyntheticsFetchUptimesPayload",
},

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using symbols instead of string hash keys (...read more)

In Ruby, it is a best practice to use symbols instead of strings as hash keys. This rule emphasizes that it's more efficient and idiomatic to use symbols for this purpose. Symbols are immutable and unique, which makes them ideal for identifying things, whereas strings are mutable and can create multiple objects for the same sequence of characters.

The importance of this rule lies in the performance and memory usage of your Ruby application. Using symbols as hash keys reduces memory usage because they are stored in memory only once during a Ruby process. This can make a significant difference in the efficiency of your application, especially when dealing with large data sets.

To ensure you're following good coding practices, always use symbols for hash keys unless there's a specific reason to use a string. A simple refactoring from values = { 'foo' => 42, 'bar' => 99, 'baz' => 123 } to values = { foo: 42, bar: 99, baz: 123 } will make your code compliant with this rule. This not only improves your code's performance but also makes it more readable and consistent with Ruby's conventions.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

}

if attributes.key?(:'errors')
if (value = attributes[:'errors']).is_a?(Array)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using Array() to ensure the type is that of an array (...read more)

The rule "Use Array() to ensure your variable is an array" is important for ensuring your code behaves as expected, regardless of the type of data it receives. It is common in Ruby to need to iterate through an array of items. However, if the variable is not an array, this can lead to unexpected behavior or errors.

The Array() method in Ruby is a Kernel method that converts its argument to an Array. If the argument is already an Array, it returns the argument. If the argument is nil, it returns an empty Array. This can be used to ensure that a variable is an array before trying to iterate over it, preventing potential errors or unexpected behavior.

By using Array(foos), you can ensure that foos is an array before you try to iterate over it with each. This prevents the need to check if foos is an array with foos.is_a?(Array) and makes your code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

# Fetch uptime for multiple tests.
#
# @see #fetch_uptimes_with_http_info
def fetch_uptimes(body, opts = {})

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Avoid using a hash as an optional parameter (...read more)

The rule "Avoid hash optional parameters" is a guideline that encourages developers to explicitly declare parameters instead of using a hash for optional parameters. This is because using a hash for optional parameters can make the code harder to understand and maintain. It can also lead to unexpected behavior if a developer accidentally includes a key in the hash that the method does not expect.

This rule is important because it promotes code readability and maintainability. It also helps prevent potential bugs that may occur due to unexpected keys in the optional hash. By explicitly declaring each parameter, developers can easily see what parameters a method expects, making the code easier to read and understand.

To adhere to this rule, instead of using a hash for optional parameters, explicitly declare each parameter in the method definition. For example, instead of using options = {} in the method definition, declare each parameter like name, email, age. This way, anyone reading the code can easily understand what parameters the method expects and in what order.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch 2 times, most recently from e3b3f25 to e29cc8c Compare September 6, 2024 13:17
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from 3f9488b to 12c5582 Compare September 11, 2024 14:06
Comment on lines +8 to +10
public_ids: [
"p8m-9gw-nte",
],

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Consider using the %W syntax instead (...read more)

The rule "Prefer %w to the literal array syntax" is a Ruby style guideline that encourages the use of %w notation instead of the traditional array syntax when defining arrays of strings. This rule is part of the Ruby community's efforts to promote readability and simplicity in Ruby code.

This rule is important because it helps to keep the code concise and easy to read. The %w notation allows you to define an array of strings without having to use quotes and commas. This can make the code cleaner and easier to understand, especially when dealing with large arrays.

To follow this rule, replace the traditional array syntax with the %w notation. For example, instead of writing ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'], you should write %w[foo bar baz]. This will create the same array, but in a more readable and concise way. By following this rule, you can help to make your Ruby code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch 4 times, most recently from 08a741c to 5f485b6 Compare September 12, 2024 09:25
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch 2 times, most recently from 5e82d6a to b3176df Compare September 12, 2024 15:59
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from 9bf98f1 to 8a07e66 Compare September 17, 2024 11:56
# HTTP header 'Accept' (if needed)
header_params['Accept'] = @api_client.select_header_accept(['application/json'])
# HTTP header 'Content-Type'
header_params['Content-Type'] = @api_client.select_header_content_type(['application/json'])

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Quality Violation

Suggested change
header_params['Content-Type'] = @api_client.select_header_content_type(['application/json'])
header_params['Content-Type'] = @api_client.select_header_content_type(%w[application/json])
Consider using the %w syntax instead (...read more)

The rule "Prefer %w to the literal array syntax" is a Ruby style guideline that encourages the use of %w notation instead of the traditional array syntax when defining arrays of strings. This rule is part of the Ruby community's efforts to promote readability and simplicity in Ruby code.

This rule is important because it helps to keep the code concise and easy to read. The %w notation allows you to define an array of strings without having to use quotes and commas. This can make the code cleaner and easier to understand, especially when dealing with large arrays.

To follow this rule, replace the traditional array syntax with the %w notation. For example, instead of writing ['foo', 'bar', 'baz'], you should write %w[foo bar baz]. This will create the same array, but in a more readable and concise way. By following this rule, you can help to make your Ruby code cleaner and easier to understand.

View in Datadog  Leave us feedback  Documentation

@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from 0811f48 to 742bc42 Compare September 20, 2024 14:34
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from 742bc42 to eff5c27 Compare September 26, 2024 16:24
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from eff5c27 to bc5349c Compare October 2, 2024 14:17
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from bc5349c to 0645f2e Compare October 2, 2024 14:24
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot force-pushed the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch from 0645f2e to 45e0402 Compare October 2, 2024 14:34
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot merged commit e7da72b into master Oct 2, 2024
15 checks passed
@api-clients-generation-pipeline api-clients-generation-pipeline bot deleted the datadog-api-spec/generated/3072 branch October 2, 2024 15:27
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
* add support for top level indexing

* Regenerate client from commit 3b4747f4 of spec repo

---------

Co-authored-by: Sherzod Karimov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot] <54105614+api-clients-generation-pipeline[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ci.datadog-api-spec <[email protected]> e7da72b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants