Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CMIW] Add Space Efficiency Score to ContainerImage proto #361

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Stephanie0829
Copy link
Contributor

@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 commented Jan 13, 2025

What does this PR do?

Adds a proto field space_effic_score to allow agent to write scores to backend.

Motivation

Additional Notes

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Describe how to test/QA your changes

  • Ran rake codegen and rake test which had no errors.
image

Reviewer's Checklist

Reviewers: please see the review guidelines.

@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 requested review from a team as code owners January 13, 2025 18:11
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 force-pushed the stephanie/add-effic-score branch from 8b7e46e to 7e24f5f Compare January 13, 2025 18:16
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 force-pushed the stephanie/add-effic-score branch from 6aafed6 to d415ad6 Compare January 13, 2025 18:21
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 force-pushed the stephanie/add-effic-score branch from d415ad6 to 55efeac Compare January 13, 2025 18:26
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 changed the title [CONT Innovation Week] Add space_effic_score to ContainerImage proto [CMIW] Add space_effic_score to ContainerImage proto Jan 13, 2025
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 changed the title [CMIW] Add space_effic_score to ContainerImage proto [CMIW] Add Space Efficiency Score to ContainerImage proto Jan 14, 2025
@Stephanie0829 Stephanie0829 marked this pull request as draft January 17, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants