Skip to content

Conversation

@philipanda
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@philipanda philipanda requested a review from filipleple December 1, 2025 14:19
@philipanda philipanda force-pushed the redundant-boot-slot-a-protection-tests branch from d6cb6dc to 9060983 Compare December 1, 2025 14:35
@philipanda philipanda marked this pull request as ready for review December 1, 2025 14:38
@philipanda philipanda force-pushed the redundant-boot-slot-a-protection-tests branch from 9060983 to 32b1f94 Compare December 1, 2025 14:40
@philipanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested by verifying whether bios-lock feature locks the expected offset range using:

&{COREBOOT_REDUNDANT_BOOT_BOOTBLOCK_OFFSET}=    start=0x00900000    end=0x00ffffff
&{COREBOOT_REDUNDANT_BOOT_COREBOOT_OFFSET}=    start=0x00900000    end=0x00ffffff

and enabling the bios lock in setup menu manually instead of checking for the not-yet implemented locks of slot A in coreboot redundant boot.
coreboot-redundant-boot_log.html

@philipanda philipanda force-pushed the redundant-boot-slot-a-protection-tests branch from b042ac7 to c63ba66 Compare December 1, 2025 14:49
Signed-off-by: Filip Gołaś <[email protected]>
@philipanda philipanda force-pushed the redundant-boot-slot-a-protection-tests branch from 1f6636f to 0a69f6d Compare December 1, 2025 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants