unique device name and routing instace combination #101
Conversation
DanSheps
left a comment
DanSheps
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This will also require a migration which seems to be missing.
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
mrhyks
force-pushed
the
unique-name-on-device
branch
from
917ae46 to
338f946
Compare
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sheppard <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Sheppard <[email protected]>
DanSheps
left a comment
DanSheps
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please fix the Ruff failures and change the black formatting back to 1
pyproject.toml
Outdated
| [tool.black] | ||
| skip-string-normalization = 1 | ||
| check = 1 | ||
| check = 0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| check = 0 | |
| check = 1 |
|
At this point I don't know how to fix this migrations issues. I wasn't able to replicate it or fix it locally as pipeline suggests. |
You will want to update the branch from main as there is a another migration at the same "level" (has the same parent migration). Once updated, you will just need to rename your migration and change the parent migration to the one at 0016 still. |
…_and_more.py to 0017_eigrprouter_netbox_routing_eigrprouter_unique_device_name_and_more.py
...outing/migrations/0017_eigrprouter_netbox_routing_eigrprouter_unique_device_name_and_more.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…prouter_unique_device_name_and_more.py
|
I fixed it for you, hopefully this one completes |
Thanks, this idea came through my mind, but I was too tired to try it. |
2 participants
Fixes #100 and will not break existing instances.