Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow rejudging when there is only a single judge #1902

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 22, 2022

Conversation

Ninjaclasher
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1902 (292122e) into master (03c91d2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1902   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.25%   46.25%           
=======================================
  Files         231      231           
  Lines       13045    13045           
=======================================
  Hits         6034     6034           
  Misses       7011     7011           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
judge/bridge/judge_list.py 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 03c91d2...292122e. Read the comment docs.

@quantum5 quantum5 merged commit a5b2b16 into DMOJ:master Mar 22, 2022
@Ninjaclasher Ninjaclasher deleted the fix-single-judge-rejudge branch February 6, 2023 05:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants