Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v7r3] Replace singularity with apptainer #6440

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: rel-v7r3
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chrisburr
Copy link
Member

Keeps a SingularityComputingElement class for backwards compatibility, though this class also uses apptainer behind the scenes. I propose we remove SingularityComputingElement from v8.0.x but we can keep it until v8.1 if people prefer.

Draft for now as I haven't tested it yet.

BEGINRELEASENOTES

*WorkloadManagement
NEW: Replace SingularityComputingElement with ApptainerComputingElement

ENDRELEASENOTES

@DIRACGridBot DIRACGridBot added the alsoTargeting:rel-v8r0 Cherry pick this PR to rel-v8r0 after merge label Oct 20, 2022
Comment on lines +39 to +42
if six.PY2:
assert res["SubmittedJobs"] == 0
else:
assert res["SubmittedJobs"] == 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a copy and paste of the SingularityCE test so I have no idea, I defer to the original author of the change 😅 96de927#diff-3ed8e61b9808b5f01275986e1b4401914daf0ce427d6ebd4f809f695948fe43a

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AH, it must be correct then! 😄

Maybe because it's only py3? #5716

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
alsoTargeting:rel-v8r0 Cherry pick this PR to rel-v8r0 after merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants